User talk:OO7vikasinsan

Welcome

Hello, OO7vikasinsan, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Boxofficeindia.co.in

Hi there, I've reverted this edit of yours because you re-introduced content supported by boxofficeindia.co.in. This is not the same site as boxofficeindia.com. The latter site is generally considered reliable, but the former site is not. In some cases, boxofficeindia.co.in has clearly just regurgitated claims made by film producers about gross, which would make them a primary source by proxy. We don't typically care what a primary source (a film's producer, director, lead actor) says about financial data, because they would have every reason to lie. Sites that are generally considered acceptable may be found at WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baar Baar Dekho

Hi there, you might want to reconsider the budget figure you added here. Though BOI indicates ₹53 crore, the Indian Express seems to feel the 50-ish budget included print and marketing costs, which are not typically included in a film's production budget, since they're not part of production. I don't have a great solution, since my instinct is that BOI is mistaken here, but maybe presenting the figure as a range (₹35–53 crore) or just leave it blank with a link to the production section ([[#Production|See production]]) with a prose explanation. However I think this may be one of those "use common sense" issues, and if we have multiple sources (IBT here) that say 35 + marketing, then maybe it's a safe bet to say the budget was 35 crore. Regards Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree with you that BOI is mistaken here so I put both statements in Production section with a title ([[#Production|See production]]) in infobox. Regards OO7vikasinsan (talk) 04:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the CityLights (2014 film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Vikasksinsan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 04:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OO7vikasinsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir, My family also use this computer so such this incident was there related to multiple accounts. I am extremely sorry for this. But I pledge that Only my personal account i.e. OO7vikasinsan will be login here from this address. I will not allow any other account from this IP address. Please unblock me as Wiki is my life. Inconvenience is regretted OO7vikasinsan (talk) 09:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted below, your edits have been inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition to the sockpuppetry, you've been using your accounts disruptively to advertise and spam across many articles. —SpacemanSpiff 09:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]