User talk:OIBUR0802

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "O'Donnell.Brain", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent an entity, may be used for promotional purposes per WP:COI, and implies shared usage. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OIBUR0802, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OIBUR0802! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need several in-depth references from reliable, independent sources to show notability. Currently all of your sources are what is known as primary sources. Also, please do not use raw links in the body of an article, as you did in the department section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

While there's significance and sourcing, I believe this would be best merged to the university's own article, given there's not enough to suggest the beyond information and sources, something that can accompany the school article instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute

Hello, OIBUR0802. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter O'Donnell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]