User talk:Nyxaus

Nyxaus is offline, taking a wikibreak

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Nyxaus}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

I like to fight vandalism by monitoring the recent changes page.
If I reverted your edit and you think I was wrong to, please be polite, it may have been a mistake.

Road to the Multiverse

I have left some commenteries on the review page--Saint Pedrolas J. ^{Hohohohohoh merry christmas} 23:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have commented--Saint Pedrolas J. ^{Hohohohohoh merry christmas} 15:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have taken a look and responded. -- Nyxaus (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message... Even if the episode had been broadcast five years ago, the GA guideline would still apply. Ω phois 19:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The information that does not exist pertains to a fourth of the article (another fourth of which is in-universe plot). If basic info like that is not available, then the question of notability should probably be taken into account. Ω phois 19:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:1.3 Blind Date.png

Thank you for uploading File:1.3 Blind Date.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See below Nyx aus 23:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:1.6 Jack Meets Dennis.png

Thank you for uploading File:1.6 Jack Meets Dennis.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem with these images? They both have a full and proper free use rational? Nyx aus 23:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I realize I haven't included the Licensing information, apologies. Have marked both with {{Non-free television screenshot}} and have removed the warning. If this doesn't resolve the issue please contact me again. Thanks - Nyx aus 23:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

Many of your recent edits don't appear to conform to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television). 98.248.33.198 (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many 30 Rock episodes are parody titles, which can easily be confused with what they are parodying. Because of this placing (30 Rock) after the titles helps improve clarity. Nyx aus 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"For an article created about a single episode, add the series name in parentheses only if there are other articles by the same name." That obviously isn't the case with the articles you're renaming. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, many editors working on these episodes prefer to add it, the redirect would have been created anyway. (I do not add the series name for any other series but thanks for the advice) Nyx aus 00:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to agree with the IP here. Articles like "Greenzo", "Jack-Tor", and "The Rural Juror" probably aren't going to be confused with other articles. Even if they are parody titles, I don't see how someone could accidentally type in the parody when it has different spelling and words inserted. I think it would be better to revert the titles back to what they were before because really there's no reason to add the series in parentheses. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 04:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2.9 Ludachristmas.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2.9 Ludachristmas.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 07:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussions are almost always ended by an administrator, and rarely by uninvolved editors, but they are never closed by those involved with them unless its a retraction by the nominating editor. I have not, and am not retracting the deletion nomination for the reasons previously specified: (a) WP:NFCC#10a requires listing the artist, publisher and copyright holder, which this media has not. (b) The non-free content policy on screenshots requires critical commentary on the media used, which there is not. Nothing in this article requires the use of somebody else's copyrighted material to understand, nor does the FDP make a sufficient argument for such. I am cross-posting this discussion for openness' purpose ([1]). — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But

What was wrong with my fucking edit!--78.151.16.70 (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to disappoint you but Chuck Norris was not a former member of JLS :) - Nyx aus 19:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie Bordo

I'm telling you, Cassie Bordo is quite lovely. I met the Bordo family a couple of months ago. Great people! Judy Butler introduced us. Judy is also a great, lovely woman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.138.33 (talk) 18:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you think so however Wikipedia has very strict neutral point of view guidelines, remember this is an encyclopedia! - Nyx aus 18:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrophilic

Hello. I came across that very edit while on RC Patrol but wasn't sure enough to immediately revert. I noticed that you did revert with confidence. For me, chemistry was decades ago, but I was wondering... if it is hydrophilic, then the next part of the sentence (insoluble in water) confuses me. Is that correct, or does that need to be edited as well? Thank you. 152.16.16.75 (talk) 11:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am aware, cellulose strands are hydrophilic, being able to form hydrogen bonds, however it preferentially forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups on other cellulose strands instead of water and so is insoluble, and due to the polymeric nature of cellulose means water only surrounds the polymer and cannot penetrate the sheets of cellulose, see File:Cellulose spacefilling model.jpg. I may be wrong and if you think I am, it may be worth raising this point on the talk page. - Nyx aus 12:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(OP from another IP) That makes sense. Thank you for taking the time to explain it. Happy editing! 152.16.59.102 (talk) 23:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I had to think about it myself! - Nyx aus 22:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:3.10 Generalissimo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:3.10 Generalissimo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nyxaus. Listen, it was nothing "against you", it's just that your upload was "622 × 350" in pixels. According to the Non-free content criteria, the image should be uploaded in a lower resolution, hence why my upload is at "300 × 169" pixels, which abides by the guideline. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request

Hi. How do I delete a page that I made?

Disneyworld014 (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Disneyworld014 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, but please, do contribute constructively to Wikipedia! - ηyχ αμς 22:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Tagging

Hi, I noticed that you tagged Jimmii nguyen for speedy deletion as a test page. I assume that you merely made a mistake, but be a little more careful as to which button you press in Twinkle. (and no, that wasn't a test page. possibly not notable, but not a test)--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 01:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I acted a little too quickly on that page. My mistake. - ηyχ αμς 12:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuke Nomura

FYI, the creator removed the CSD tag you placed on Yusuke Nomura. Since this page has been repeated recreated, rather than restoring the CSD tag, I sent it to AfD with a recommendation that it be salted. GregJackP (talk) 16:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. - ηyχ αμς 16:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been speedily deleted, salted, and the user temporarily blocked. GregJackP (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to move a article from my user page to main namespace?

Hello, Yesterday, my article Speedy deletion nomination of Compare++ is deleted. How do I correct it? Today, I create it in my user page, but don't know how to move into main namespace? Can you help me? 04:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liuxin4335 (talk • contribs)

Thanks a lot for your great help. I have updated my user page. Would you please help me to review it? Thanks again, 07:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liuxin4335 (talk • contribs)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this will help me tremendously! - ηyχ αμς 22:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cesar Tomas Lopez

The article said he was a board member of the province of Bohol, Philippines. In Portal:Bohol, he is identified as notable people of Bohol. Pinay (talk•email) 19:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The person themselves may be notable, however A7 denotes "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." The article you created did this and therefore was suitable for speedy deletion. Take a look at Your First Article. - ηyχ αμς 19:29, 26 May 2010 (UT::

I am still getting sooo there. I have to tell you FYI, in case you did not know that I did all these: Arnold Zamora, Edgar Chatto, Francis Escudero, Antonieto Cabajog, Rene Relampagos and many more. These are the rest of my contributions to wikipedia here - http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Pinay06/Contributions So it goes without saying that i know what i am doing and i am getting there. i just needed a little bit of time. something came up when i was starting ths stub that i had to stop and deal with it first off wiki...I will appreciate it if you can restore it back so i can continue my work, and you can do yours. Ciao Pinay (talk•email) 19:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, no offense intended. If you have created so many articles before then are you not familiar with creating an article in your user space until ready to move to the main space? This would mean your start up article won't get slapped with a tag which, can I remind you, was appropriate in this case, as an Admin did indeed delete the article. I am not an Admin, and did not delete it, just nominated it under Wikipedia's guidelines, I have no way of getting your article back. - ηyχ αμς 19:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. My advice for next time is check on the credentials of the editor first before doing something, or maybe give it say 24 hours if not sure? anyway, before i responded to your posts, i had already informed the admin User:Zscout370 since he and I worked on almost all my articles together as well...Good job though in handling this situation. you are to be commended for such maturity, openness and speed. Stay in touch! -Ate Pinay (talk•email) 20:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gatso Flatty

Good judgement call, nicely executed, with a resulting merged article that was better than both of the original articles. Well done. That is all :) Thparkth (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation of Arctic Fauna & Flora (CAFF)

Hi Nyxaus For some reason you deleted am page I made - Conservation of Arctic Fauna & Flora (CAFF)

I have no idea why - CAFF is not a company or selling anything it is one of the Working Groups under the Arctic Council

And as such deals with conservation of biodiversity in the Arctic - conducting assessments of status and trends in Arctic biodiversity with all arctic council countries and indigenous organisations

I would appreciate it if you could explain why the short text I put on CAFF was deleted

I work for CAFF - www.caff.is

There is no monetary gain or anything connected with CAFF our mandate from the Arctic council is to assess and monitor arctic biodiversity

One of the more well reports we helped to develop was the Arctic climate impact assessment

Anyway it would be good to hear from you as I have to admit I find it frustrating that my entries are deleted

Take Care

Tom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomcaff (talk • contribs) 22:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom. I am happy to explain: I flagged your article for speedy deletion under A7 as it was an article about a group/corporation that did not meet the notability guidelines. Another editor decided it was notable, but not as its own article, but as a section/redirect in Arctic Council, and thus DGG redirected it as such. Check the article's history page for editors comments. It also did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organization and companies; to avoid this in the future I would check the guidelines for the type of article you're creating before publishing the article. If you need anything else, get in touch. - ηyχ αμς 19:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance, Please

Hello. We are attempting to create a Wikipedia page for Galveston.com & Company, the official tourism marketing web presence for Galveston, Texas. We absolutely wish to ensure our page is acceptable to your organization.

Our organization is set up very similarly to NYC & Company (albeit on a much smaller scale), so we relied on that organization's Wikipedia article for guidance.

We'd very much appreciate any assistance/guidance you could give us.

Please note: Regarding the 'notability' issue, if you'll look at both "Galveston" and "Galveston Island" Wikipedia articles, you'll see Galveston.com cited in both as the Official Tourism entity, in partnership with the Convention & Visitors Bureau. Jimcordell (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimcordell (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcordell (talk • contribs) 20:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Improving the Article

As requested, here are a few tips for getting the article up to scratch, take a look at:

Wikipedia's notability guidelines
- More specifically the general notability guidelines
Manual of Style
Your First Article

A few things to mention from looking at the article straight away is to try to get:

An infobox filled with relevant information, i.e. Template:Infobox Company or Template:Infobox Non-profit
Get a wider coverage of the subject area, i.e. in reviews/news/online journals about the company
Improve your referencing, one reference isn't really enough to satisfy the significant coverage or reliable sections of the general notability guidelines.
An important point is:

"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.

You are clearly employed/affiliated by the company in question, this is why the neutrality is debatable, and the only reference you give is from the company's website. Perhaps it would be better written in the future by a third party?

I would defiantly start with the general notability guidelines. You mentioned that your website is referenced on other Wiki articles. This makes those articles notable, not yours. For this article to be notable, it must be fully referenced from a wide variety of secondary and tertiary sources.

I hope this helps, if you require any further assistance please do get in touch or place {{helpme}} followed by your question on your talk page and someone will respond ASAP. Happy writing! - ηyχ αμς 20:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Improving the Article

Thanks very much - we appreciate! To begin, we've added several facts and references from other, external sources. I'll continue to attempt to improve. Jimcordell (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimcordell 24.149.217.128 (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

24.149.217.128 (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summonmaster13

This guy's been here since 2006 and has written a few of these article. Apparently, being a head coach is considered notable; go through his talk page for examples. I'm merely mentioning in passing; I have no involvement. HalfShadow 21:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Don't template the regulars, please. SD tags are one thing, but warnings are another. HalfShadow 21:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter how long a user has been editing - if the article they create when published meets the guidelines for SD, it gets tagged. If that user removes said tags without following protocol, that user gets warned. Standard guidelines. It seams that they have improved said issues, although External Links do not count as references, and the articles lack complete in-line citations. Improvements still need to be made, although it is not far off a good stub, but needs to be marked as such. - ηyχ αμς 21:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack Wills Logo 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JWOutletLogo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JWOutletLogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nyxaus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JWOutletLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JWOutletLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Recblock

Template:Recblock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. kleshkreikne. T 13:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Recblock-v

Template:Recblock-v has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. kleshkreikne. T 13:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]