User talk:Nylnoj

Welcome!

Hello, Nylnoj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 23:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Green Frog Farm

Hello, Nylnoj. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Green Frog Farm".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Your recent editing history at Trap–neuter–return shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining - I didn't understand the protocol and I thought the system was glitching when my edit was overridden. I'll wait for a response. Nylnoj (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hello Nyloj. Since it looks like you're interested into starting the DRN process with me, I think it's important to discuss some grievances I have with your conduct up to this point. Specifically, WP:ASPERSIONS and personal attacks, both on-Wiki and off. The diffs in question include:

I'll also note that Geogene's edits to the TNR subsection of the Feral Cats page have also been flagged by another editor for negative bias in the Talk section. [1]

to make sure anyone adjudicating this on that page understands that this is one person's ax-grinding, and nothing close to a fringe theory [2]

if it's a slow process and each edit will end up in RfC, this could take years. I'm guessing that this is possibly @Geogene's intent. Anyway to find out how the extensive edits in 2021 were allowed? I have a hunch that @Geogene knows. [3]

Looking at the edit history on the page, it looks like Geogene began introducing anti-TNR talking points into this page in 2021 and has had a gradual run-up over the last three years in increasing to inject content that discredits TNR so that the page essentially functions now as a vehicle for anti-TNR propaganda. [4]

There is so much that needs to be done to the page to bring it back to neutrality and Geogene has a history of aggressively fighting edits. [5]

DRN is a voluntary process that will not continue unless I choose to participate. Unless you do a better job of discussing content, not contributors, then you will be trying to reach consensus by yourself at DRN. Geogene (talk) 01:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]