User talk:Nwright6302

Good work, but please use edit summaries

I saw your edits to nebula, and I think that they are an improvement on what I wrote. I would just like to ask that you use edit summaries that indicate what you are doing. For example, if you change the name of a section from "Diffuse nebulae" to "The light from nebulae", you should write that in the edit summary. Again, thank you for working on the article. Dr. Submillimeter 09:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Iphas6pn.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Iphas6pn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iphas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iphas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]