User talk:Number87

Welcome!

Hello, Number87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Deb 14:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn A. Aber

A tag has been placed on Lynn A. Aber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Prewitt81 05:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete templates placed on your page. If you wish to protest, follow the procedure by placing {{hangon}} in the article as instructed. --Prewitt81 06:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You have created quite a number of new articles over the past few days. While many of these seem noteworthy, some may not make the grade. In particular, Wikipedia has criteria for establishing who is deemed worthy of an article, and simply being married to somebody famous does not count; have a look at this for further information. Chris 21:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read our manual of style and our policy on copyright violations. --Wafulz 03:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can see why, but I think the ones who are married to certain people of famous families should be added for being either in the entertainmnet business or another job that make them noticable.

And I have a question: Why is the article of Luke Redgrave, member of the famous Redgrave family keep being deleted? He's part of the family and he's camera-operator in films.

A tag has been placed on Onjolee Nair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 20:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mukesh Bhatt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 20:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India quick links

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Newcomers: Welcome kit \| Register: Indian Wikipedians \| Network: Noticeboard \| Discussionboard Browse: India \| Open tasks \| Deletions Contribute content: Collaboration Dashboard - India WikiProject - Wikiportal India - Indian current events - Category adoptions

utcursch | talk 15:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh Bhatt

Please don't remove a speedy delete tag from an article you wrote. Please read the instructions on the tag as to how to contest the deletion nomination. Corvus cornix 21:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ross Hart has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mart inp23 20:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy ^talk 22:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. IrishGuy ^talk 22:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is creating an article of a member of a professional wrestling family against a policy?

CFD

Category:Sex Symbols, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for Discussion page.

--After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your category

Please stop adding this category (sex symbols) to pages, it is a violation of WP:NPOV. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 15:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Douglas

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Peter Douglas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Douglas

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Joel Douglas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas Carradine

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Kansas Carradine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gail Jensen

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Gail Jensen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doris Rich

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Doris Rich, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Sorel

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sonia Sorel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gabi Ferrer

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Gabi Ferrer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Fisher

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Todd Fisher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Duddy

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Christopher Duddy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyn Mitchell

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Carolyn Mitchell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Devry

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Elaine Devry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Aber

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Christopher Aber, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Number87

I believe all these people that I have written for should not deleted because I want people who like to know about their connections to a certain family, if they are either married or blood related or their other relative married to someone who is from a famous family. Also, for each one, for my case, I either cannot find more information on most of them or I fear what the biographies I might write would be be copyright from somebody else. And I would like someone else who is a member of the website to take care of the rest.

If you think that the articles should not be deleted, just go ahead and follow the process in the links above. Please remember however to comment in the edit summary or on the talk page with your reasoning. I would note however that most of these articles have been here for a few weeks and have not yet been improved by other editors. Stub articles are fine to have here, but it is my opinion that articles need to do more to establish notability that to say Person X was related to Person Y. That could be a start, but something additional needs to be there, such as: The person acted in this role, or directed this production or some other information besides being related to someone famous. You will note, for instance that I did not tag Hayley DuMond with a {{prod}} as it has additional information to demonstrate that the person is notable on their own right. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 18:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of deleted content

Please do not re-create deleted categories as you did at Category:Rooney family --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 14:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The Rooney family is a Hollywood family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.43.100 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 19 April 2007

Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 11#Show business families, where the consensus was to delete. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 14:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But these famiilies are in show business:

Category:Redgrave family
Category:Rooney family
Category:Sheen-Estevez family
Category:Stiller family
Category:Travolta family
Category:Trump family

I don't know about the Trump family in the Hollywood families category, but I believe all the families should have their own categories.

I do not think the Ron Burgundy page should not be deleted because I beleive readers should read about the title character besides the film.

Your recent edit to Emilio Estevez (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Please stop creating one sentence articles that are completely devoid of context. IrishGuy ^talk 18:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy ^talk 18:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How are they inappropiate?!

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. IrishGuy ^talk 18:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not.

Every article you have created has been deleted. You have been asked to read the guidelines before continuing but you choose not to. Stop creating one sentence articles about non-notable subjects. IrishGuy ^talk 18:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to WWE One Night Stand (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 06:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Song of Freedom

Hey. When you can't move a page like Song of Freedom (film) to Song of Freedom because there's already a redirect it's best to put in a move request at Wikipedia:Requested moves (WP:RM) so it can be moved properly and the edit history preserved. Cutting and pasting one page to another is generally frowned upon. I'll set this one up there. Thanks, Doctor Sunshine talk 20:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rock music

Hey there. I see you're adding a bunch of albums to Category:Rock music. Most of the albums seem to already be categorized using subcategories of Category:Rock music. Per WP:CAT articles should generally not be categorized using both a category and a subcategory thereof. Have a nice day. --PEJL 18:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, you're adding song articles to the Rock music category. Unnecessary. Category:The Who songs, for example, belongs to Category:Rock songs which belongs to Category:Rock music. Wasted Time R 19:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone all of your improper categorization. Please do not do anything like this again. Fixing nearly 150 articles is nothing but an annoyance. 07:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Wayne Hart

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wayne Hart, by Hateless, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wayne Hart seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wayne Hart, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Wayne Hart itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock musical?

Hi. Your article, The Grail - The Rock Musical of the Future, doesn't make sense to me. How can it be a "rock musical" if the music is not rock? If the title is intended as a joke, the article should say so, instead of calling it a rock musical. If the title is not a joke, then the comment in the article doesn't make sense. Either way, the article needs revision. --Russ (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a rock musical

Go to:

http://www.donlinke.com/musicals/

It's the second on the list of rock musicals. By the way, a rock musical doesn't have to have rock music in it. Some rock musicals like Rent do have rock song, but most of the songs, like Seasons of Love, do have a rock-type style of music to them.

Saturday Night Live

Please stop adding people to Category:Saturday Night Live actors. This is a category which was deleted by consensus in the past, and will shortely de deleted again: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 June 12#Category:Saturday Night Live actors. Thanks/wangi 08:40, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor

A tag has been placed on Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. greenrd 00:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mario: Game Over

For this sort of speedy tagging "db-web" is better than "db-bio" which is for people/groups. exolon 21:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced entries on List of Internet phenomena

Please stop adding entries to the article without providing a reliable source demonstrating their notability. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gabriella Palazzoli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bfp _(talk) 17:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category rock operas

Please stop adding Category:rock operas to articles which are not rock operas, an individual song would be better categorised as Category:Songs from musicals. I am still working through your previous contributions, sorting out miscategorised items and have been doing so for the last six hours. Please think before adding anymore.--Alf ^melmac 14:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Whose Line Is It Anyway? actors

A tag has been placed on Category:Whose Line Is It Anyway? actors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Category:Whose Line Is It Anyway? actors is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:Category:Whose Line Is It Anyway? actors]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Star dust 8212 12:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Christopher Duddy

Christopher Duddy, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Christopher Duddy satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Duddy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Christopher Duddy during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson 14:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Symbol category

The "sex symbol" categories have been deleted, please do not restore them without opening a dialogue at Wikipedia:Deletion review first. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

categorization

Hi Number87 -- I reverted one of your edits as vandalism, but on closer look at your contributions, I think that you may just misunderstand how categories work. Specifically, you added Category:World Wrestling Council to the category Category:Organizations established in 1973 (diff). The way you did it, you basically said that "Orgs established in 1973" are a subcategory of the World Wrestling Council. I think you wanted to go the other way, and say that WWC is a subcategory of "Orgs established in 1973". In that case, you would add Category:Organizations established in 1973 to the Category:World Wrestling Council -- not the other way around.

Categories can be rather confusing & non-intuitive. Try reading Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ to get started, and feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or it seems confusing.

Cheers, Lquilter 20:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS -- You might also try overcategorization which talks about when to tag articles about people with categories for organizations they belong to and performances they gave. Wrestling is not my field, but it seems likely or at least possible that someone might find these categories to be overcategorization. You are likely better qualified than me (at this point) to assess whether it's overcategorization, once you understand the way categories work here on Wikipedia. You might also try reading WP:CLS ("categories, lists, and series infoboxes") -- sometimes, people create categories because it's the easiest way to get started, when actually the information would be much better and friendlier in a list. WP:CLS helps explain which format is the best way to present information, and when to use them, and how to set them up. Cheers, Lquilter 20:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kishan Kumar

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kishan Kumar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kishan Kumar. Subdolous (talk) 22:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Default sort

Please stop changing the default sorts for WWE PPV's to "WWF" and "WWE". They are supposed to be sorted by the PPV name (Backlash, Unforgiven, etc.) TJ Spyke 07:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marcos Valdés

I have nominated Marcos Valdés, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Valdés. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — iridescent 14:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional superheroes

Category:Fictional superheroes, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Nohansen (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating the Pee-wee Herman article.

It's basically just a copy of sections of the Paul Reubens article; having it twice serves no purpose. HalfShadow (talk) 03:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Internet phenomena‎

This article makes it very clear that new entries must have sources indicating that they qualify as a "phenomenon." Please don't add unsourced material to it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Debra Dion

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Debra Dion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 12:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Debra Dion

I have nominated Debra Dion, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Dion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TravellingCari 14:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Rat Pack

Category:Rat Pack, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 23:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Number87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Joel Douglas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mónica Bardem - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
James Daughton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Malaika Parekh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tanvi Azmi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alejandro Bichir - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rosalía Valdés - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Blanche Thebom - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mike Winters (comedian) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhea Pillai

The article Rhea Pillai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. None of the sources cited gives more than passing mention.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Arkin

A tag has been placed on Anthony Arkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 01:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marisol Nájera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marisol Nájera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NW (Talk) 03:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susie Cusack‎

The article Susie Cusack‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onlynone (talk) 02:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Cusack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Cusack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Cusack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arya Babbar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arya Babbar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wikieditindia (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arya Babbar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arya Babbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arya Babbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wikieditindia (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Derek Basco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Basco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Basco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of We Go Together (song)

The article We Go Together (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca Pogrow

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rebecca Pogrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Amidon

The article Kim Amidon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{subst:Afd notice|Beatrice Alda}} Prisencolin (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miriam Marx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Marx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Marx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]