User talk:Nukeless

I prefer a world without nuclear power. I oppose to nuclear globalization. Renewable energies can address climate change and protect the environment from dangerous residues. --Nukeless (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Huawei

I have nominated Category:Huawei (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robot

I see you made an edit to WP:Robot, Nukeless...please continue to make any changes you like. However, I will have to make some changes because it doesn't conform to the Manual of Style, and you broke the link. WP:Robots is one of the pages that we're trying to keep "pretty" so that we can get Featured Article status someday. Just a suggestion, this isn't required or even standard, but it might be easier for you to add content to robots.wikia.com first, and then move it to WP:Robots when we have checked it out. — Dan Dank55 (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to change the page again, it includes information about this relevant and important world event (iREX). Yes and I can do the future changes in the robot Wikia (but I don´t see any link to it in the external links; it would be there)--Nukeless 06:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Nuclear compensations

Category:Nuclear compensations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Sustainable energy organisations

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Sustainable energy organisations, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Sustainable energy organisations has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Sustainable energy organisations, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Alternative energy economics

Category:Alternative energy economics, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coulomb Technologies

A tag has been placed on Coulomb Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Coulomb Technologies and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. , mac Mion (talk) 13:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Petroleum fuel engine

I've pointed this at Petrol engine rather than Petroleum. Seemed more appropriate. I'm a little surprised at your choice of redirect. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is different. Gasoline (also called petrol, but not petroleum) is a petroleum fuel. Also diesel is a petroleum fuel. So, gasoline (petrol) and diesel engines are petroleum (not only petrol) fuel engines. This is because petroleum also includes diesel, not only petrol (gasoline). --Nukeless 10:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Energy emergency

I have nominated Category:Energy emergency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Dakar Rally. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Climate change in Idaho

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Climate change in Idaho, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 20:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flex fuel vehicles

Hi there. You did very constructive edits on the article indeed, but this is to let you know why I did a couple of partial reverts. First, the Fiat vehicle is called Tetra, and the explanation is given in the source, so changing it to tri-fuel is your WP:OR, even if you are right (you need a WP:RS to support this change). Second, before I did the re-write of the leading, I did explain in the Talk page that following wiki policy the most common term in English for flexible-fuel vehicles refers to ethanol flex vehicles, and it should prevail over the more technical definition (though I kept the technical def for any fuel). That is why that explanation belongs to the leading and not to a separate section as you did. Notice that the current content in the article refers to E85 and Brazilian full flex only, as reflection of the common use of the term. If you follow the links in terminology regarding bi-fuels you will see that there are other articles talking about hydrogen or natural gas vehicles. Please go to the proper section in the Talk page, and let's discuss this issue there with other contributing editors. --Mariordo (talk) 02:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I try to do it as much constructive as possible. I saw the use of different concentrations from the same fuel are not different fuels (E100 and E25). One could change "In 2006 FIAT introduced the Fiat Siena Tetra fuel, a four-fuel car developed under Magneti Marelli of Fiat Brazil.[8] This automobile can run on 100% ethanol, E25 (Brazil's normal ethanol gasoline blend), pure gasoline (not available in Brazil), and natural " to "In 2006 FIAT introduced the Fiat Siena Tetra fuel, a flexieble fuel car developed..." or simply "In 2006 FIAT introduced the Fiat Siena Tetra fuel, a car developed...".Reference to ethanol as main technology is in the leading. But the rest of the explanations are in a concrete sections. A topic to discuss: can one call biodiesel certified vehicles as flexible fuel ?. Why or why not ?. --Nukeless 08:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Plagiarism

Hi,

As the bulk of your edits seem to involve heavy plagiarism from US government sites and other wikis, please ensure that you read WP:Plagiarism, and in particular, the section on attributing the source of the material. In the future, when verbatim copying material, please take care to mention the source in your edit summaries, and if this forms the bulk of an article (e.g. Climate change in Idaho), then also use an attribution template.

In fact, on the subject of edit summaries, I've noticed that you very rarely use them. Not filling it in is considered bad practice; please read WP:ES.

Best regards, Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 08:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism ?. I think you don´t know what is plagiarism. Resources in the public domain (as United States Federal Goverment works) are in the public domain. You confuse private works with the public domain, public domain that anyone can use. On the other hand, are you a Linux user ?. I am a Linux user too.--Nukeless 08:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

On the contrary, I don't think you've read the guideline I pointed you at above, as in the second sentence it says "The copyright status of the work is irrelevant; directly copying a public-domain work is still plagiarism unless the original work is noted.".

And yes, at home, I'm a Linux user. Regards, Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 08:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I see you have just created another article without an indication of attribution, and are continuing to make many edits, none of which have edit summaries. I would strongly encourage you to stop editing so fast, and to spend a little more time reading up on standard Wikipedia editing practices, as continuing to ignore the guidelines (especially when you've been specifically informed about them) could eventually lead to more serious repercussions. Regards, Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 11:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This idea about plagiarism is very original. Plagiarism is the unauthorized use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work. Because is not my original work (it is released under GFDL/public domain license, without my copyright), I personally atribute nothing. In any case, there is not problem about include a reference to the original website, because this text in the public domain is not mine nor owned by anyone else. --Nukeless 12:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia, I'm afraid you have to comply with the Wiki guidelines, even if you don't agree with them. Issues to do with copyright, licensing, attribution, etc. are taken very seriously, and every effort should be taken to ensure that the standard practices are adhered to. Providing a reference is not enough, as this doesn't indicate that the precise wording has been taken from that source (i.e. it's indistinguishable from any other reference). It doesn't take a lot of effort to comply with this particular guideline, so please do so in the future! Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 13:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Mobile modems

I have nominated Category:Mobile modems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Solar power in Spain

I have nominated Category:Solar power in Spain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Renewable energy in Spain

I have nominated Category:Renewable energy in Spain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Active cruise control

I have nominated Category:Active cruise control (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Modem drivers

I have nominated Category:Modem drivers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Enzyme companies

I have nominated Category:Enzyme companies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Energy management companies

I have nominated Category:Energy management companies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in Nevada

I have nominated Category:Climate change in Nevada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in Massachusetts

I have nominated Category:Climate change in Massachusetts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in California

I have nominated Category:Climate change in California (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in Hawaii

I have nominated Category:Climate change in Hawaii (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in Washington

I have nominated Category:Climate change in Washington (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 19:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Climate change in Wyoming

I have nominated Category:Climate change in Wyoming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 20:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Now2

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Template:Now2|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexanderpas (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Now3

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Template:Now3|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexanderpas (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Third Industrial Revolution

A tag has been placed on Third Industrial Revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NJGW (talk) 22:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ESolar

A tag has been placed on ESolar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 08:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coal in the United States

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Coal in the United States, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 07:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tata Motors

This edit done by you is highly disruptive. The vehicle being talked about has got nothing to do with Tata Motors except that it was inspired from one of Tata's models. Please be more careful while making edits. --Delhi Belly 2 (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Small cars for deletion

The related Category:Small cars has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for Discussion page.

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 18:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Ecology of the United States by state

I have nominated Category:Ecology of the United States by state (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fossil derived gases

Category:Fossil derived gases, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James H. "Buck" Harless listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James H. "Buck" Harless. Since you had some involvement with the James H. "Buck" Harless redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peak fossil fuel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Peak fossil fuel. Since you had some involvement with the Peak fossil fuel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solar energy noise barrier listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Solar energy noise barrier. Since you had some involvement with the Solar energy noise barrier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil fuel engine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fossil fuel engine. Since you had some involvement with the Fossil fuel engine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Charge-maintaining hybrids

Category:Charge-maintaining hybrids, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Departments of Environmental Quality

Category:Departments of Environmental Quality, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fdeg

Template:Fdeg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Breezy Point, Nevada

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Breezy Point, Nevada, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Global Green Solutions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Green Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Green Solutions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gasoline engines

Category:Gasoline engines, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NAHBGreen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NAHBGreen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAHBGreen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cooked sliced ham listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cooked sliced ham. Since you had some involvement with the Cooked sliced ham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 18:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boiled ham listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boiled ham. Since you had some involvement with the Boiled ham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SolarPower Europe Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SolarPower Europe Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aalep.eu/solarpower-europe. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow environmentalism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow environmentalism. Since you had some involvement with the Yellow environmentalism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Geographic accident" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geographic accident. Since you had some involvement with the Geographic accident redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ecotax has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ecotax has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Vpab15 (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]