User talk:Nugneant

I seem to have been blocked without fair warning. The "warning" came at 1:30am UTC, the "block" came at 1:48 UTC. In between these times I made exactly zero (0) contributions.

The "vandalizing" is likely a personal vendetta that user Megaman Zero has against me, for reverting a content-deleting edit of his. For details please check the Wikipedia history for "Vega" ( http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Vega_(Street_Fighter) )

Aside from that, the only other edit I made today was pointing the user "Phoenix" in the direction of some sources for a SimCopter easter egg.

Please visit Megaman Zero's talk page, you'll find he has a history of making poor, despotic edits, such as removing spoiler tags and blanking articles without consensus.

Regardless of the snide tone I may have taken on his user page, I feel this is double jeopardy --Nugneant 05:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Nugneant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 06:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank content

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Washington Metro. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Washington Metro, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So editing out POV comments is a bannable offense, but removing comments from the other POV (as you and one other user have already done) is fine? I left comments in your talk and in the talk of the W. Metro.

Given that you are new here, it might do some good for you to become acquainted with Wikipedia Policies and guidelines. These include verifiability, and citing sources. As a regular reader of the Washington Post and other local papers (e.g. Washington Examiner), I notice quite a lot is written about Metro (positive and negative). The fact (it's not an opinion) about Metro's crime and policies is cited and substantiated, and thus not POV. If you can cite something that substantiates the point about the "detractors" then it can also be included. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 17:04, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed some of your comments directed at User:Boothy443 and User:SchuminWeb. I suggest taking a look at policies including WP:AGF, and WP:NPA. Some of your commments, particularly those directed at Boothy443, are borderline violations of WP:NPA. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 17:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So revert all my edits, because that is a logical counter-measure. So sorry for expressing an opinion. So sorry that some are too sensitive to allow others their opinions. --Nugneant 19:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God Bless You

I am History21 22:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)History21History21 22:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC), of the whole Maryland debacle, and I think that you are just wonderful. In particular, the way that you chastised Boothy for his typos was quite admirable; WillC was exceptionally furious with me for editing out typos on his talk page. He accused me of vandalism. I hope that you will continue to fight WillC over the Maryland issue, and I also hope that you will alert other editors to what's going on. This WillC character is deleting all information (even cited information) that disproves his point of view. I suppose that in that respect he is truly representative of the South.[reply]

Thats nice. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 02:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Ha!

I have found a grammatical error in one of your edits! Victory is mine! I'll point it out to you later. By the way, you should visit WillC's talk page and leave some imput there. Check its history section to read my own contribution, under "Enough is Enough."

History21 21:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)History21[reply]

Atheism

Hi, just wanted to let you know that you most likely added an incorrect template during you most recent edit to Atheism. I made a correction; please review.

On an unrelated note, I sincerely hope that your response to History21 immediately above is a joke, and that you are in fact good friends picking on each other.

Best,—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 20:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I figured as much :) Thanks for responding. Best of luck to you.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 20:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:KI, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks.  —xyzzy_n 19:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours

For committing vandalism and personal attacks, you have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. —David Levy 19:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SimCopter easter egg

Hi, you added information about a SimCopter easter egg that was later removed by Maxis; could you point out a source that gives more details about the easter egg controversy? It would be useful so that more details can be added to the SimCopter article itself too. Phoenix-forgotten 22:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Danny Lilithborne 01:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

48-hour Block

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against WP:VAND and WP:NPA. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.
Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History21

Hi, it's me again. Can you help me with anothewr article? Go to Leader of the Eyre/Heller Dynasty in the United States and have a look. They're trying to delete a whole string of things I've written, all of which are legitimate.

History21 17:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)History21[reply]

P.S.

u r a stinki wanxter, n u shud b shot.

Aaaaah!!!

I am very concerned about the conduct of a one User: Zoe, who seems to have possibly been abusing administrative privileges. She has deleted several of my articles and a number of others. I'm not sure yet, but I think that the misdeeds may be enough that we should consider taking some form of action against her--even up to requesting that she be banned. I wish to appeal to the higher administration of Wikipedia but do not know how.

I have been targeted along with two other users, one of whom appears to be a genuine vandal and the other who seems to be a sincere contributor. I would appreciate your advice.

History21 05:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)History21[reply]