User talk:Nuclearram

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Arjun (tank)‎‎. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. (Hohum ^@) 00:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help me in improving Drdo article

I added history and removed the extra info as separate article +nt for info) But ClueBot it PLz help me

here is my edited version http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Defence_Research_and_Development_Organisation&oldid=363902150

Cluebot version : http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Defence_Research_and_Development_Organisation

I know u have improved arjun and tejas in very perfact manner.

--59.94.150.177 (talk) 11:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

In my opinion sections of various missile projects and the radar systems are going into way too much detail even when they have their own main article.I think the best way to shorten the article would be to prune the various sections going into too much detail and turn it into a summary with only the main points remaining,read through the article to correct grammatical errors to improve reading experience, convert Indian Rupee to US$ etc.

There is also no need to add what the DRDO director or the Army chief are saying about so and so...

For this you will have to read through the article and edit paragraph by paragraph.It might help to go through the articles of various defence organisations,defence contractors etc. If you want me to help i'll be happy to assist you:) --Nuclearram (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HAL Tejas

I know that 88.106 reverted my edits (said user is a troll) but if I am not mistaken I believe you (in good faith) removed the information because you did not feel it was salient. Regardless, I think the information was important and that if an audio clip detailing the exact pronunciation of the word is there, it should be kept as not everyone may know how to pronounce the word. See this diff page. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arjun (tank), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IMI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pracharak0‎. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]