Jump to content

User talk:NuclearEnergy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, NuclearEnergy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear energy policy by country

[edit]

Hi, NuclearEnergy. Please stop blanking sections as you did in the Nuclear energy policy by country article. That kind of changes need discussion before implementing. Right now I reverted your edits back. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Give me just a moment, and I'll hop to it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think there should be a bit more consensus on the talk page at Talk:Nuclear energy policy by country. I'll make redirects for now; those can be easily expanded if/when the time comes. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear energy in Bangladesh

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nuclear energy in Bangladesh, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.weeklyholiday.net/2010/290110/mis.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Greece

[edit]

Category:Nuclear energy in Greece, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine ✍ 15:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Atomic Energy Commission

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Greek Atomic Energy Commission, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.eeae.gr/en/index.php?fvar=html/president/_info_about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/International_response_to_the_Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents

[edit]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/International_response_to_the_Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.214.253.186 (talk) 02:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Teamwork Barnstar
I went home at 2:00 AM last night when we had nought but a few redlinks and consensus and Voila! I return to the site 12 hours later to enjoy a tightly organized articulation of the International reaction to Fukushima. Nice work! Geofferybard (talk) 20:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you would be interested in working on Diablo Canyon and SONGS articles?Geofferybard (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like your user name

[edit]

This isn't a helpful comment, but I like you username and I'm surprised it was available when you registered! -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 15:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NuclearEnergy. You have new messages at Talk:Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant proposal.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Greek Atomic Energy Commission, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.eeae.gr/en/index.php?fvar=html/president/_info_about, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Greek Atomic Energy Commission saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move warring at Electricity meter

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Electricity meter, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Electricity meter. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Andy Dingley (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Conversion of units of energy

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Conversion of units of energy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Kilowatt hour. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kilowatt hour - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eeekster (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wind-hydro station for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wind-hydro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind-hydro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Nuclear energy in Yemen for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear energy in Yemen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear energy in Yemen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SharabSalam (talk) 04:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Malta

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Malta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Croatia

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Croatia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Luxembourg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Luxembourg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Myanmar

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Myanmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nuclear energy in Chile

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nuclear energy in Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nuclear energy in Argentina has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Nuclear energy in Argentina has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 12:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lanai Pumped Storage Project

[edit]
Notice

The article Lanai Pumped Storage Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposal that has not moved forward lacks lasting notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lanai Pumped Storage Project

[edit]
Notice

The article Lanai Pumped Storage Project has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NuclearEnergy&oldid=1090139264"