Jump to content

User talk:Ntkn766

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ntkn766 (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Ntkn766Ntkn766 (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (September 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 04:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ntkn766! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 04:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Uday Garudachar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ravensfire (talk) 15:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the he is the owner of the mall.
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Garuda_Mall Ntkn766 (talk) 05:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vijayclicker93 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vijayclicker93. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DatGuyTalkContribs 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ntkn766 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not the sock puppet of any accounts i dont have multiple accounts i have only this account now request you to kindly unblock my account Ntkn766 (talk) 07:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusha Rai (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hako9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
hako9 (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]