User talk:Nrcrain

Understood, I have added disclosure of COI to my user page. Let me know if what I have done is sufficient. Did I go about requesting an article in the correct way? As I understand it, my company meets the guidelines for relevance, and is already linked in at least two pages. ^[1]^[2] My goal was to get my company into the queue of articles being considered, not to write the article itself, which I understand is discouraged.

Appreciate the guidance, I've never attempted Wikipedia edits of any kind, and I'm certainly wanting to play by the rules.

Nrcrain (talk) 23:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Nrcrain[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Glosten, Inc., from its old location at User:Nrcrain/Glosten, Inc.. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 20:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Glosten, Inc. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glosten, Inc.. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Glosten, Inc. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glosten, Inc.. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Glosten, Inc. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glosten, Inc.. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 02:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glosten, Inc. (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The majority of the sources may verify what's on the page, but the amount of coverage of Glosten is almost nonexistent; they're really just one-sentence mentions giving credit to Glosten for designing XYZ project. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. This will immensely help demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glosten, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 15:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Glosten, Inc. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glosten, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/RV_Sikuliaq

[2] ttps://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/RP_FLIP

[1]

[2]