User talk:Nradabhatse die Katze

Hello, Nradabhatse die Katze, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Using talk pages

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC) At least i dont censorship other peoples work. Now worries Jy??dog! I got backups and more to come... :) Nradabhatse die Katze (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Schizophrenia

1. Potentially valid links:

https://www.zentrum-der-gesundheit.de/neuroleptika-ia.html http://flexikon.doccheck.com/de/Neuroleptikum http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101689 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27216902 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802081 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0028111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0056458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0021642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0089395/ http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/Effective/MIrwinNonDrugSchizophreniaTreatment.pdf https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/99/6/417/2258701/Why-are-doctors-still-prescribing-neuroleptics https://www.nationalelfservice.net/populations-and-settings/service-user-involvement/do-we-need-a-truth-and-reconciliation-process-in-psychiatry/ https://simplecapacity.com/2017/08/what-a-shaman-sees-in-a-mental-hospital/ https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/08/prenatal-exposure-psychotropic-medication-linked-long-term-cognitive-impairment/ https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/05/psychiatry-defends-its-antipsychotics-case-study-of-institutional-corruption/ https://www.madinamerica.com/2016/07/the-case-against-antipsychotics/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6UikVwxX_sSVHRxdnN6MmlEX3c/view https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Animism http://criticalpsychiatry.co.uk/index.php/articles/35-documents/46-the-case-against-schizophrenia?fref=gc http://jpn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/31-2-93.pdf?fref=gc https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/12/is-mental-illness-real-google-answer http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001861&type=printable https://recoveryinthebin.org/ https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/06/mad-psychologist-speaks-out/ https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Die-politische-Oekonomie-von-Science-2-0-3375775.html http://home.broadpark.no/~wkeim/files/open_letter_Roessberg.html http://home.broadpark.no/~wkeim/files/open_letter_knowledge.html http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44219/1/9789241598774_eng.pdf https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lgbt-activists-slam-the-most-important-psychiatrist-of-the-last-half-centur http://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/bipolar-disorder/bipolar-disorder-childhood-trauma-brain-structure/article/680288/ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2017/discrimination-in-health-care/en/# https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/08/patients-schizophrenia-show-better-work-functioning-off-antipsychotics/ http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17533015.2017.1334002 http://cepuk.org/2014/03/30/video-whats-wrong-psychiatrys-diagnostic-manuals%e2%80%a8%e2%80%a8/ http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/this-video-dispels-every-nature-vs-nurture-myth-youve-ever-heard/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OXwwe3DKHU&fref=gc&dti=1564150087162991 http://www.sethhfarber.com/ Nradabhatse die Katze (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal was rejected

Your proposal listed at WP:VPR was rejected because, as noted by the closer, ProgrammingGeek, it was "This is completely ridiculous and not even a proposal.".

Feel free to dispute this, or come up with a better proposal. You may ask me for help clarifying this.

Note that you are much more likely to gain resolution on the talk page of the articles in question.

Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 20:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Considering Human Rights and liabilities is "ridiculous" and "not even a proposal? Well, that explains, the problems you guys seem to have. Maybe look up "soziopath", instead of www.un.org?

Good luck with the coming eeerrh... "sudden weatherchanges". signed Nradabhatse die Katze (talk) 04:45, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nradabhatse die Katze: It was rejected because you have failed to show credible evidence that it is human right abuse. Furthermore, it is not in WP:VPR scope. Therefore, you should have raised that issue on the talk page, not on VPR. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 10:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn`t aware of a possibility or necessity to prove a certain human rights abuse in order to propose page admins actually being knowledgeable in said human rights. Nor did i claim reasons on my part to actually sue. Thank you for actually providing a readable link / reason for your decline of my proposal, but as i tried to imply, neither science nor international law recognizes wiki-laws as binding. I have tried to reason on the respective talk page at which point wiki-laws (here the right to discuss on the talk page without censorship or whatever it is or was called) suddenly didnt`t apply to the admin any more. If you really want i can try again and report back with credible evidence of non-scientific reasoning and potential to infringe on human rights in a timely manner.

But this my talk page and i currently still believe i can reason here: The human rights that factually come into effect are called "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities" and they are quite a few by now for very bad reasons. If you could actually read them before talking BS here, i might be able to act in kind.

For now i remain that the admin(s) of e.g. the page "Schizophrenia" do payed or otherwise intentional false flag editing and i will refrain from further helping his / their cause by making them aware of their rather easily debunkable misstakes like the joke with 50% prevalence of schizophrenia in tested groups of true? twins with a parental background of schizophrenia being evidence for inherital genetic causes. To me this was more like proof that a german student of 12th grade high-school biology would be more fit for writing said article.

And the introduction given last time i looked at the article taken for diagnostical advice to inexperienced readers would even qualify most non mono-theistic gods for early forced retirement. Maybe Jy??dog and Co are true belivers of the One God... x<d:))) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.152.94.202 (talk) 07:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia "Commitment schemes"... x<d:)))

<html>https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Commitment_scheme</html>...

Ashens 2 ashes... Nradabhatse die Katze (talk) 04:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sunk by Nerds 1

A real beauty and agile enough to kill herself by backing up into a supertanker. Then limping to rest ashore and take a short dive afterwards: <html>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:F313_Helge_Ingstad_(ship,_2007)#/media/File:KNM_Helge_Ingstad_i_Ler%C3%B8yosen.jpg</html>

Got to get me one of those... Nradabhatse die Katze (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]