User talk:NrDg/Archive 090331
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:NrDg. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
- Please continue any conversation where it was started.
- Thus if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you want to initiate a conversation, please create a new heading here.
- Continue existing conversations under existing headings.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Indent your comments when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your comments automatically using ~~~~.
Archives:
- 070625-070920-071102-071231
- 080101-080131-080229-080331-080429-080531-080630-080731-080831-080930-081031-081130-081231
- 090101-090131-090228-090331-090430-090531-090630-090731-090831
Editnotices
Hi NrDG
We could very easily change {{editnotice}} or {{Editnotice load}} to display a link to the notice outside the box. That would give a consistent look of all notices instead of some having a backlink, some not. I'd prefer having a small "v·d·e" link on top of the box, I think, aligned to the right. Or probably just "v·d" since it's admin-only anyway.
That's probably a discussion for WT:Editnotice though. What do you think?
Cheers, Amalthea 03:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- The purpose is to be noticed and motivate some desired editing behavior. I wouldn't like anything that would catch attention before the message. I like the "v-d" or similar idea but it needs to be someplace unobtrusive. Right now I am just experimenting to see what is an effective notice. I put the back link in small text at the bottom more for my convenience in finding the notice than for anything else. Probably less important with the current naming scheme. My goal right now is to solve a specific problem with the few articles I have put notices on so want to make it easy for myself to modify the notices to try different things. --NrDg 04:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Extra attention today
Probably worth paying some extra attention to Zac Efron today. Interview magazine published some pics of him with a nude woman that isn't Vanessa Hudgens, so I anticipate some vandalism from angry young girls.—Kww(talk) 14:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
DemiLovatoWishes
I've been watching this editor out of the corner of my eye for a while. I was waiting for her to actually do something disruptive instead of just leave messages on user talk pages. This revert of yours surprised me: I read it as her first statement of intent to edit an article, but you seem to see it as a forum comment.—Kww(talk) 14:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- You're right - I reverted myself on this. I didn't originally see how the added comment related to the previous one. --NrDg 14:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure what action is needed, but it is painfully obvious that DemiLovatoWishes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Track Seven (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 66.223.171.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are one and the same.—Kww(talk) 04:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- No action yet. It is allowed to have more than one account (I do, for example) as long as they are not used abusively. The IP is just forgetting to log in. WP:MULTIPLE. They should tag it though. --NrDg 14:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
lyrics???
Is it ok to make pages for song lyrics???? cause Im really new to wikipedia and i really dont know how to do like anything to do with editing or making pages so yeah DemiLovatoWishes (talk) 04:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kww answered the question on your page. --NrDg 13:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
My comments on the talk page are in direct response to the quoted text from the article, criticizing and pointing out the shortcomings of the current wording from the article. This is exactly what the talk page is used for and I encourage you to participate. Viriditas (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- My bad. Sorry about that. --NrDg 14:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. I've tried finding sources so that we can update it, but I don't have time to do the required work at the moment. I'll try and update the article in the next day or so if I can find a RS. I did find a few blog sources, but I don't think those meet RS, so I haven't added them. It looks like the newest tats have covered up his entire upper body and arms, and according to the page history this wasn't true when the section in the article was last updated. Viriditas (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)