User talk:Npatel92

Welcome!

Hello, Npatel92, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 05:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Npatel92, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Npatel92! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Apollo (butterfly) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Apollo (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)." Linneana Belgica 15.8 (1996): 309-10. Print.</ref>) In addition to this larval camouflage, the larva also shares in a form of Mullerian mimicry with

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Queen (butterfly)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Queen (butterfly) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 07:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Queen (butterfly)

The article Queen (butterfly) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Queen (butterfly) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Variable Checkerspot

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Variable Checkerspot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Variable Checkerspot

The article Variable Checkerspot you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Variable Checkerspot for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heliconius charithonia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heliconius charithonia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heliconius charithonia

The article Heliconius charithonia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Heliconius charithonia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]