User talk:Notneha

February 2016

Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeon So-mi has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film

Hi, you should probably familiarize with Template:Infobox film if you plan to edit film articles. With regard to this edit, gross values in the infobox are presumed to be worldwide, unless otherwise specified, so there is no value to re-adding the superfluous label. It just needlessly clutters the infobox. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Valeria Lukyanova, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Valeria Lukyanova. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know why you are insistent to use the {{INRConvert}} template, but you've added it at least three times at Udta Punjab [1][2][3] despite clear notes directing you to the relevant discussion. Since it appears you haven't bothered researching it, here's a link to the discussion. There are a few chief problems:

We are arbitrarily converting Indian Rupees to US dollars. Why?
The conversion is only valid for a short time. If a film was released in 2009, why would we convert the gross to 2016 US dollars?
Even if we perform the inflation calculation with the INRConvert template, we wind up with far more information than is warranted for that infobox parameter.
Template:Infobox film doesn't encourage the performance of inflation calculations.

Thus, the community seems to prefer omitting it. If you wish to participate in the discussion to swing the consensus, that's fine, but continued submission of the template when consensus does not prefer it, is disruptive. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize for using the INRConvert template on Udta Punjab. I did not receive any notifications until today. I also saw the discussion you provided for me, and I remember someone saying that it does not benefit anyone, but I do not see an issue with using the template. You stated that it would not make sense for using it for a movie released in 2009, but Udta Punjab was released this year, so the conversion is relevant. I am not trying to say that you are wrong; I simply do not understand why it such an issue. However, I will not be using the template anymore, and I apologize for using it when you told me not to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notneha (talk • contribs)

I find it difficult to believe that you didn't receive any notifications, because you presumably received notifications when I reverted you here and here. Moving along, there were four issues raised, not just one. The problem with the long-term accuracy is important, because what, you're going to come back once the figures are no longer accurate and remove the template? Not likely. You're still welcome to voice your objection, but the place to have this discussion is at the talk page linked above. In the interim, I've unblocked you. This is a community editing project, so discussion is crucial. Ignoring the discussion on your talk page tends to look like you're only here to do your own bidding. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(I'm typing here because I'm not exactly sure how to talk on the discussion page; I apologize.) I did not ignore the discussion on purpose; I did not know about it until a couple hours ago.

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked per discussion above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Notneha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Notneha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]