User talk:Nothing matters after all

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nothing matters after all (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm here talking and explaining to the administrator who was talking to me. Dlohcierekim you just left two words called more disruption, where is your responsibility, that two words simply mean you just wanna hurt me. Also how do you think that I can see the warning before, I don't even know how this page works before the instruction of unblocking shows me to post here

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nothing matters after all (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do you think I'm disrupting Wikipedia? I'm making it more understandable, beside the page on fact, what else did I do, I'm just showing my friend how all the links lead to philosophy, what makes you think that the ip address should be blocked Favonian

Decline reason:

more disruption -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the reviewing admin

Apart from the banal, WP:GTP-related disruption, in spite of several warnings to stop, there's this blatant attempt to vandalize another user's talk page. Favonian (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nothing matters after all (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How do you think that I can see the warning, I don't even know this page before the instruction shows me to post here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Learning has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Learning was changed by Nothing matters after all (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938368 on 2018-02-18T19:14:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fact, you may be blocked from editing.

Please don't disrupt Wikipedia for the sake of playing a game. It is not helpful to the readers. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 19:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Just plain Bill. General Ization ^Talk 19:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]