User talk:Not Dilbert

John T Reed

Hello,

Regarding your recent edits to John T Reed, you removed the {{fact|date=March 2007}}, added a note about buying his books, and noted a case about libel he won.

I'd like to see citations for the court assertion and for the fact check you removed. Also on the book thing, not sure why that would belong in biography, seems to be promotion.

As such, I'm going to revert these changes. Please feel free to discuss on talk page of that article.

Thanks.

WilliamKF 21:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you insist on adding a claim without a citation, and with a slightly abusive edit summary. Again, it has been reverted. Why not give a citation? Or does it give you some kind of thrill to behave like this and cause conflict? --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note on John T Reed you have now reverted the article 3 times in 24 hours. Please read WP:3RR. Reverting again would get you an automatic ban, however correct you seem to be --BozMo talk 14:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Coulter

Regarding this edit please do not mark edits as grammatical when they are not grammar edits. In general, please do not use misleading edit summaries. Thanks. JoshuaZ 00:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't. Reuse of a word is a matter of style, it has nothing to do with grammar at all. JoshuaZ 13:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]