User talk:NotScaredOfAVirus

April 2020

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Kofi Kingston was not recognized as tag team champion in The New Day’s fourth reign. Please stop adding that he is tied for the record of most reigns. Sekyaw (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE personnel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The vulgarity isn't helping your cause...please stop Vjmlhds 18:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

And all this back and forth wound up being for naught, as Gronk is going back to the NFL, reuniting with Tom Brady in Tampa Bay. It's almost as if he saw all of this, quoted Eric Cartman from South Park and said "Screw you guys, I'm going home!" Vjmlhds (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 20:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of WWE personnel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NotScaredOfAVirus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I should be unblocked because I am just following what the W.W.E. says about Baszler. Her profile page on the website says that she is still on NXT, so she should be placed under the NXT women's roster.NotScaredOfAVirus (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Your statements here are not relevant. Yamla (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest you review WP:EW. It says in the first paragraph "But my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is no defense. So no matter how strongly you feel you are right, its not an excuse. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 00:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be smart...

Don't start up again after you just came off a block.

Take your beef to the article's talk page, and we'll hash it out there.

Gotta be smart...Wiki top men don't exactly like serial edit warriors.

You just got out of a hole - don't be so quick to dig yourself a new one.

There's a reason the old song goes "I fought the law, and the law won."

Vjmlhds (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE personnel, you may be blocked from editing. You're pushing it....take it to the talk page, and we'll let consensus figure it out. 1 more edit, and you'll have violated 3RR in record time when you just came out of a block...you really are playing with fire, and if you get burned, you'll only have yourself to blame. Vjmlhds 15:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

WP:RED amd WP:REDBIO

Please read the above 2 guidelines. There is no reason you should be removing red links like you did on Money in the Bank (2020) - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As Galatz said, read those guidelines --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you are removing links you shouldn't be. If you read WP:DONOTFIXIT you will see links to the Usos individually are correct, as are the Street Profits. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 16:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Money in the Bank (2020), you may be blocked from editing. TheDeviantPro (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR

I think you should read several policies, like WP:OR. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Imperium (professional wrestling), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 04:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imperium (professional wrestling), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Wolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man

Link are available within one to two hour at WWE website so you direct copy and paste the link.you totally delete . Why RB2616 (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NotScaredOfAVirus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just defending my actions on why I deleted an article with no URL link to a website when it was not posted yet. NotScaredOfAVirus (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. I suggest talk page access be revoked to match the master if the next unblock request isn't significantly better. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]