User talk:NorCal764

Welcome!

Hello, NorCal764, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

BOVINEBOY2008 10:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beach drifter (talk) 06:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Internet constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 07:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber ‎, you may be blocked from editing. (As explained on my talk page.) SummerPhD (talk) 20:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rent Is Too Damn High Party, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (As discussed on my talk page. SummerPhD (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of common descent

NorCal764n, your resent edits to evidence of common descent are not disruptive, however, your information does not describe any evidence of common descent. There is an article called evolution of birds which this information can be used. As for this article, the evolution of the bird is not a direct example of evidence (and one source for obscure for something that has many sources is not reasonable). Secondly, just adding a section about the evolution of birds is not appropriate. If the information was incorporated into the article properly then it might stand. For now however, your edit is vague, not even close to descriptive on the topic, and branches to an entirely new topic. If more can be written and displayed like the direct evidence of the evolution of the horse, then it can be added. For now, it is unnecessary and evolution of the bird is mentioned else ware in the article. A. Z. Colvin • Talk 03:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]