User talk:Noophelia 2.0

Noophelia 2.0, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Noophelia 2.0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Noometry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noometry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noometry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bondegezou (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate accounts

Hello Noophelia. It's a very interesting topic, but in relation to Wikipedia: I wondered, is this an alternative account of Aeremin? If so, per WP:VALIDALT it should probably be specified on the user page (if not, I'm sorry for suggesting it). Also, do you have a particular relationship with Eryomin or Noometry? Per WP:COI guidelines this should also be specified if so (WP:DISCLOSE). Happy editing, —Paleo Neonate – 17:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Noophelia 2.0! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Features of "authority control" and how to improve its correct reflection, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Aeremin per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aeremin. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]