User talk:Nooblet2

A tag has been placed on RUDI and the Gays, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. michfan2123 15:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT start creating these nonsense pages again. You Will be blocked if you try this again like you did before. Improbcat 15:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is suspected of being a sockpuppet of User:Cheeselor1. That person's various socks qwere responsible for the last round of these "Rudie and the Gays" nonsense articles. Improbcat 15:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RUDI and the Gays[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article RUDI and the Gays, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Fabrictramp 15:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is being used only for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Rlevse 15:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nooblet2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was made a long time ago. I feel that i have greatly matured since the block and can be of great value to the wikipedia society

Decline reason:

Unless you've matured considerably further in the last few minutes, it's still clearly too soon, as FisherQueen has demonstrated rather well. - Vianello (Talk) 19:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admins: see also User talk:Nooblet3, especially this recent edit. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]