User talk:Nono64/Archive 2011

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nono64. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 2005

←

Archive 2009

Archive 2010

Archive 2011

coincidence

Literally in the last few hours have been using [[Annie Cardell-Oliver]]'s annotated copy of [[M.H. Ellis]]'s book the 'Garden Path' - and the article pops up on my watch list - happy new year to you - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Obsessive editing

You have OCD-like editing behavior, at this point for polyphenols contributing little. Why don't you give the polyphenol page a break for a month, and we can both take a rest? --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 20:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Cnidarian anatomy stubs

[[:Category:Cnidarian anatomy stubs]], which you created, has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/January/18#Category:Cnidarian anatomy stubs]]. The stub type most likely doesn't meet [[Wikipedia:Stub|Wikipedia requirements for a stub type]], through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at [[Wikipedia:Stub]]. Please feel free to make any comments at [[WP:SFD]] regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals]]!  [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 14:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Juice Plus ingredients

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Juice Plus ingredients]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Juice Plus ingredients|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. — [[User:This, that and the other|This, that]], and [[User talk:This, that and the other|the other (talk)]] 11:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Road designation Green

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Road designation Green]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Road designation Green|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. — [[User:This, that and the other|This, that]], and [[User talk:This, that and the other|the other (talk)]] 07:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

WWF's "forests" vs your "forest"

These are not a single forest, they are a group of forests, not just geographically but also by type....which is why the WWF titles their names "forests" in the plural. [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] applies - "follow the sources". Please revert your page-moves, they were incorrect.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 08:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC) : I think you should long before have done the redirects yourself (or your staff in the project you are in) to avoid people to move the pages in the singular as it is the regular form for article titles. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 08:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) ::Regular form? ''The regular form is that which is used by the source designating this term''. YOu are wildly off-base here; read the citations on the article, read the article, don't just blindly follow what you ''think'' is a "rule"....it's not. It doens't help that "wiki lower-case-ism", as I call it, turned what are ''titles'' and ''names'' conferred by a particular organization into what ''seem'' like are generic terms (but are not). [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] is VERY CLEAR - "follow the sources". The same is in [[WP:TITLE]]. You have created a "new term", the idea that the Pacific temperate coastal rainforest ecoregion is ONE forest. It is NOT (I know, I live there), it is ''many'' forestS.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 09:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC) ::: Well, I'm sorry to have put you in such a bad mood. I will nevertheless try to apologise fot the mess. I hope your week-end won't be all messed up. Cheers. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 10:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Please defer to [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] for ecoregion names. They were defined in 2001 and are still widely used. For example, the 2010 [http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520262560 Atlas of Global Conservation] uses them. They are also used in the scientific literature. See, for example, this recent paper on the [http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 Napo moists forests] of the western Amazon. Changing their names on Wikipedia will create confusion and most likely result in the name changes gradually being reverted. [[User:Miguel.v|Miguel.v]] ([[User talk:Miguel.v|talk]]) 16:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Mention of Fischer-Speier esterification in "Aging of Wine"

I suggest removing the mention of Fischer-Speier esterification from the "Aging of Wine" article. As you say, it is a special type of esterification, not relevent here because: 1. It is a lab synthesis method. 2. It uses reflux (boiling and condensing). 3. It is catalyzed by strong acid, mostly absent from wine. Your implied analogy of carboxylic acid catalysis with strong acid catalysis is not really valid - the pH difference is too great. Drbillellis 13:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Drbillellis|Drbillellis]] ([[User talk:Drbillellis|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drbillellis|contribs]])   : Done. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 18:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Diferulic acid(s)

Nono64 Could you please revert you page move of [[diferulic acid]] back to [[diferulic acids]]. I think it is clear from the page that it is in fact a group of compounds with very different structures and properties, and therefore should be plural to be factually correct. You have also neglected to change any of the uses of "diferulic acids" in the text of the article to match the new title. I would rather you do the page move, as you obviously know how. [[User:Terri G|Terri G]] ([[User talk:Terri G|talk]]) 14:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC) : No, I cannot reverse simply. That's the way wikipedia works. For the reason of "history" conservation, you cannot copy and paste the content back to the "diferulic acids" page which is now a redirect. The way to reverse the thing is to ask an administrator to delete the "diferulic acids" redirect. You could alternatively blank it yourself and it will have the same effect as administrators will detect a void page and delete it. Then it will be possible to "move" the title of the article from singular back to plural. For the "move", if you don't know how it works, it is probably because you don't have the "move" tab (which sits near the "history" tab on your wikipedia view). If you don't have it, you may ask an administrator for the right to have it. (for more, see [[Wikipedia:User access levels]] (move right is given to "autoconfirmed" users) and [[Wikipedia:Moving a page]]) Now consider that wikipedia article titles are generally written in the singular form. For the article "eye", the fact that we possess two of them doesn't mean we cannot tell something about one of them alone. For "polyphenol", which is a class of phytochemicals, the title is in the singular also although there are thousands of different structures known. The titles using plural are generally turned on a singular form as "list of ...s" or "glossary of ...s". For "diferulic acid", you can explain in the first lines of the intro that this is a class of molecules with more that one structure. Are my explanations clear enough? --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 19:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC) :I believe either of you could have moved this back (using the move tab) since the redirect had no other history. [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals)]] makes it clear that in these types of cases the plural is acceptable. (Articles on groups or classes of specific things.) ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 18:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC).

Repetitive linking of Human Eye

I'm not exactly sure why you have undertaken the task of linking [[human eye]] for numerous articles, though I see how it is useful for certain articles pertaining to eye diseases, etc. However, I am concerned about your repetitive linking of human eye under the appearance of 'eye' for both [[cataract]] and [[lens (anatomy)]]. As I stated last week, in both articles the specific linking of human eye is misleading as cataract and crystalline lenses are not unique to humans. The [[eye]] article gives sufficient info about the subjects and does not imply that the subjects are unique to humans. I suggest considering the context of the use of 'eye' before making changes, and ask that you do not redo the edits I have reverted. [[User:Vindicata|Vindicata]] ([[User talk:Vindicata|talk]]) 16:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC) :I double-checked the [[cataract]] article and have noticed the article is written solely from the POV of human cataract so in this case, your link may be justified. I am planning on addressing the issue of POV in the article, possibly suggesting to change the article name to Human Cataract or indicating within the article that it refers to human cataract while adding a section such as 'In other species', etc. If you have any thoughts on this, I would appreciate the input. [[User:Vindicata|Vindicata]] ([[User talk:Vindicata|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Regarding changes from brain to human brain

Hi, lots of these changes make sense, but please give some thought to whether a given article is really specific to the human brain or refers to brains of nonhuman animals as well as humans. I am finding a need to revert a substantial number of your changes. Regards, [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 20:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC) : Hi, please don't forget that most of anatomy related articles are tailored to human anatomy. In this sense, I think that most of my moves make sense. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 21:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC) :: Hi, I second Looie496's caution. [[Gene Wiki]] articles are not only about the human gene/protein, but also [[Homology_(biology)#Orthology|orthologs]] in other species. Hence it generally is not appropriate to change links in these articles (for example [[reelin]]) from brain to human brain. Regards, [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC) ::: Who really cares of animal reelin? Regards. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 21:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC) :::: Most of the studies on the function of reelin were done in animals and specifically mice. Hence in this article, the change from brain to human brain is especially inappropriate. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC) :::::I have to agree with Looie and Boghog. It makes sense in a few cases ([[antipsychotic]]s are medicines for humans), but in a lot of cases the science doesn't go that way (regardless of whether or not a particular editor cares). --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC) :::::: Concerning this [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Adiponectin&diff=prev&oldid=414665805 edit] which I have reverted, the cited {{PMID|15544426}} source starts with: ::::::* ''Animal studies Experimental data obtained on some animal models suggest that a reduction of Apn expression is associated with obesity and insulin resistance.'' :::::: Please reconsider the indiscriminate changing of [[brain]] to [[human brain]] links. Thanks. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 19:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC) ::::::: [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Vulcan_nerve_pinch&action=historysubmit&diff=414669175&oldid=412438683 Here] is another one that I have reverted: ''Although usually used on humanoid beings, ... Spock successfully performs the pinch on a horse-like creature''. ;-) [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 20:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC) ::::::::Some of the edits where you have recently replaced old links to [[Brain]] with new links to [[Human brain]], like [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Trauma_%28medicine%29&diff=414670543&oldid=413594218 here] in [[Trauma (medicine)]] seem pointless. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing, since others have to spend their time going around and removing your unnecessary additions. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 20:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC) :(outdent) Your edits are now at the level of [[WP:DE|disruption]] and will likely lead to a block of your edit privleges if you continue. Numerous editors have taken issue with what you are doing, yet you have not stopped. There is clearly no consensus that your edits are correct or that your headstrong approach is winning any converts to support your position. I have reverted your edit to [[stroke]], as this condition is well-known in a variety of other animals. Not just induced to study the human condition, but exactly the same naturally-occuring type of event and the same terminology is used to describe it. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 20:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC) ::I have rolled back as vandalism your linkage to [[Human brain]] in the [[Engram (neuropsychology)]] article, since the article says correctly that Lashley unsuccessfully looked for engrams in the rat brain, while another researcher studied the rabbit brain. Many human brain functions and defects are studied in animal models. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 20:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC) :::In cases where there is an image of a section of a human brain (or a rat brain, for that matter) and it is identified only as "brain" it would be fine to identify the species in the illustration, since the form and proportions differ greatly. In cases where animals have been used as models to study a drug or medical condition or principle of function, it should probably be left [[brain]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Nono64, numerous editors have now asked you to stop these edits, but you have continued to make them, which is, indeed, disruptive. Please see [[WP:ANI#Mass link moving from Brain to Human brain by User:Nono64]], where I have now reported you. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 22:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Fictional comic book creatures formed from electricity are not humans

Fictional comic book creatures formed from electricity, such as [[Zzzax]], are not humans. I'm going to assume that you are not stupid and you know this, but instead you are blindly making edits without paying any attention at all to what you are doing, so please just stop it. Really, just stop it.{{unsigned2|21:36, 18 February 2011|148.177.1.215}} :In this case the engineers were, presumably, human, however the link was an over-link anyway. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 18:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC).

Nanē (goddess) merger

Hi -- I notice you started the article for [[Nanē (goddess)]] and I wanted to see if you had an opinion as to whether it's the same entity as [[Nane (goddess)]] (without diacritic mark). Your article seems to repeat most of what's in the other one, which has the more detailed info. If this is two article about the same entity, I would want to merge and redirect into the one with the diacritic if appropriate. [[Talk:Nane (goddess)#Merger_proposal|The discussion is here]]. Thanks. [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] ([[User talk:Woodshed|talk]])

Disambiguation

I noticed you had done some useful work on binomial disambiguation, I would be cautious about creating new dab templates such as {{Tl|Physics disambiguation}} as there is a school of thought that says there are already to many dab templates. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 18:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC).

Turkish scientist stubs and Soviet scientist stubs

{{sfdnotify2}} [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 13:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Scaled quail

Just in case you didn't know (maybe you know better than I): there is no consensus on animals capitalization on WP. Whereas most other projects tend to use lower case, [[WP:BIRD]] firmly stands by [[Wikipedia:BIRD#Bird_names_and_article_titles|their rules]], and you'll likely get angry comments soon. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 13:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled. On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse ([[Help_talk:Minor_edit#Should_we_remove_the_Preference_setting_to_.22Mark_all_edits_minor_by_default.22_.3F|consensus discussion]], guidelines for use at [[WP:MINOR]]). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was <code>true</code>. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to <code>false</code> in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way. For well-established users such as yourself there is '''[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_78#Preference_to_mark_all_edits_minor_by_default_asked_to_be_removed_in_bugzilla:24313|a workaround available]]''' involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note. Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of [[User:Jarry1250]], [[User:LivingBot|LivingBot]] ([[User talk:LivingBot|talk]]) 20:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Acetylated Flavonols

Hello. I noticed you created a section of acetylated flavonols in [[:Template:Flavonol]]. Can you explain to me what does it mean since by looking at the structures I cannot see any acetylation. --[[User:Kupirijo|kupirijo]] ([[User talk:Kupirijo|talk]]) 00:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC) : Thank you for the remark. I changed the name into "derivative flavonols". Cheers. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 06:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Thanks. Would '''prenylated''' be more appropriate? What is the structure of Rutin S? Is there such a compound or is it a typo? Cheers. --[[User:Kupirijo|kupirijo]] ([[User talk:Kupirijo|talk]]) 22:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

2-character navbox

Hello! Following the precedent you set in 2008 on the [[A1]] series of letter-number combinations [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=A1&oldid=255616257] I just added them to the letter-letter combinations. This is now [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navbox_in_dab_page|generating discussion]]. I [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navigation_box_and_creating_a_.22perfect_two-letter_page.22_template_per_MoS|explained my reasoning here]]. Would you care to weigh in? Thanks! [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 19:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC) : Answer on Jokestress' user talk page --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 19:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Letter-number combination disambiguation pages

Hi, I see you were the one who set up [[:Category:Letter-number combination disambiguation pages]]. I was surprised to find listed in this category not only letter-number combinations, but also two-letter combinations like [[If]] and [[ZT]]. Of course, those could potentially be interpreted as numbers in base 36 or something (just as [[FF]] can denote 255 in hexadecimal), but, other than the hexademical numbers, these dab pages don't treat these as numbers. After all, you could equally well treat, say, [[AAA]] as the hexadecimal representation of 2730, yet it is not in this category. If the category is being used as you intended, I'd be interested in understanding the rationale.... If not, there's some cleanup to do.... --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 22:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC) : Please see conversation just above for explanation. Cheers! [[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 09:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Redirects

Hi Nono64. In the interests of perhaps saving you some future effort, [[WP:NOTBROKEN]] indicates that there's no need to "fix" redirects if the redirect points to the correct place, as you did [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=1997_Formula_One_season&action=historysubmit&diff=420559373&oldid=417862852 here]. Regards. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 02:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Natural phenols and polyphenolic compound stubs

{{sfdnotify1}} [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 12:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC) :Hi Nono64 - I take it you didn't read the part of [[WP:SFD]] which said ''"DO NOT rename any stub type that has been nominated here while discussion is still in progress. Any necessary renaming will be done when the discussion is closed."''. All doing that does is make the job of tidying up any renaming or deletion much harder! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]'' 08:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC) :: Sorry! I'll restore the template straight away. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 08:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

D-8

When you redirected [[D-8]] to [[D8]], you neglected to ensure that all the items on D-8 were present on D8 or moved there. If you are going to combine disambiguation pages in the future please ensure that all links are moved. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 16:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC) ==[[:Myrothamnus flabellifolius]]== [[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]] This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Myrothamnus flabellifolius]], and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sntc.org.sz/flora/speciesinfo.asp?spid=1149. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.) [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 11:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Stubs

Bonjour Nono64! There are now two separate stub templates: {{tl|Natural-phenol-stub}} and {{tl|Polyphenol-stub}}. The old template name, {{tl|Natural phenol-stub}}, which didn't meet naming conventions for stub templates, will be deleted once it's no longer used on articles. Unfortunately, we need a bit of help, since it's impossible for non-chemists to tell easily which of the articles using the template are natural phenols, which are polyphenols, and which - if any - are both. Can you help us by looking through {{cl|Natural phenol stubs}} and seeing which articles should be marked as polyphenols? Thanks for any help you can give... [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]'' 22:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K152

[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] The article [[K152]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: :'''Useless disambiguation page. I really don't think most people are going to be searching on the term K152.''' While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:K152|the article's talk page]]. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion. [[User:Safiel|Safiel]] ([[User talk:Safiel|talk]]) 18:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Letter-NumberCombination

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Letter-NumberCombination]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Letter-NumberCombination|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. [[User:Bxj|Bxj]] ([[User talk:Bxj|talk]]) 09:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Chemical diagram styles

Thanks for contributing so many diagrams for the molecules you are writing about! Many of the diagrams look fairly poor quality though...pixelated and jagged lines, some inconsistent fonts, etc. Might want to visit [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing]] for some formatting tips to make them look cleaner. I don't know what program you are using though, so I can't give any more specific hints. Let me know if I can be of assistance getting them with improved legibility and standard layouts. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 09:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of N64 (disambiguation)

[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] The article [[N64 (disambiguation)]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: :'''No need for a disambig with only one target''' While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:N64 (disambiguation)|the article's talk page]]. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion. [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 19:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

P40

Sorry, I had to revert your edit. In wikipedia one cannot completely move content from one page to another one by cut-and-paste. Please take a look at the guidelines in [[Wikipedia:Moving a page]]. [[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 19:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Cephalostachyum viguieri

Hi Nono, I noticed you created the redir of ''[[Cephalostachyum viguieri]]'' to ''[[Cathariostachys madagascariensis]]'', and I see the latter shows it as a synon., but have found no evidence that it really is a synon. Do you know where a ref for it can be found? Thanks, [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 10:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC) : Hi Hamamelis, Actually, if it is a synonym, the references given don't state it. So I can't remember why I created this redirect. The best thing to do in this situation is to ask an administrator to delete it. Do you need that I ask for it or do you want to create an article of your own? best regards! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 10:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC) ::I'll see if I can find enough for a minimal article, at least. If not we can ask for it to be deleted. Thanks! [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 10:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC) :::Done! [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 11:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC) :::: Great! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 11:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Molecular diagrams?

Just in case you haven't noticed, there are some questions at [[Talk:Vitisin A (pyranoanthocyanin)]] re: the molecular diagram that you uploaded. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 13:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC) : Thank you. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 20:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Plasmodium

Re name change: There is a bit more to this page than just a list of Plasmodium species. For this reason I think the original name for the page would be better. Or perhaps a third alternative? [[User:DrMicro|DrMicro]] ([[User talk:DrMicro|talk]]) 16:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC) : Hi, I checked the history. I am apparently not in the list of contributors to this article. So I don't understand the motive of this discussion. Can you be a a bit more specific? Cheers, --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 19:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Karsch

[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]] This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Karsch]], and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.karsch.net. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.) [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 09:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter J. Schwendinger

[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] The article [[Peter J. Schwendinger]] has been [[WP:BLPPROD|proposed for deletion]] because under Wikipedia policy, all '''[[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]''' created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one [[WP:V#Sources|source]] that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Peter J. Schwendinger|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one. [[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|talk to me]] 19:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion

[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] A deletion discussion has just been created at [[:Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures]], which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. '''[[User:Ronhjones| Ronhjones ]]'''[[User talk:Ronhjones| (Talk)]] 23:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

The disambiguation page page Clypeola

Hello again Nono64. Apparently you have not read this page[http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Disambiguation_dos_and_don%27ts] of Disambiguation does and don'ts. I have seen you do this before so maybe you don't yet know that it is against Wikipedia policy to list red links in a disambiguation page. And without the red link, this particular disambig page is not needed at all at least as yet. When someone finally gets around to writing [[Clypeola (gastropod)]], which could take years, simple hat notes on both articles would be sufficient anyway. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 22:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC) : Hi Invertzoo! I created the stub article. That would be nice however to check thoroughly if there is not a synonymy issue here regarding ''[[Zegalerus]]''. I'm sorry that I didn't find much by myself on the subject. Cheers! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 20:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC) ::Thanks for starting the ''Clypeola'' article; I fixed it up a little. Still, as a rule, if there are only two pages that need differentiating, hat notes are sufficient to do that, without creating a disambiguation page. Watch out for red links in your other disambig pages and eliminate them as necessary. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 14:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Donald S. Chandler

[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] The article [[Donald S. Chandler]] has been [[WP:BLPPROD|proposed for deletion]] because under Wikipedia policy, all '''[[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]''' created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one [[WP:V#Sources|source]] that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Donald S. Chandler|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] ([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]]) 19:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Sucker disambiguation

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/Nono64|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Fasciolopsis]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[User:KoshVorlon|'''KoshVorlon''']]''[[User talk:KoshVorlon|''' Naluboutes ''Aeria Gloris]]''''' 19:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC) [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Taenia asiatica]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].  [[User:KoshVorlon|'''KoshVorlon''']]''[[User talk:KoshVorlon|''' Naluboutes ''Aeria Gloris]]''''' 19:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Bayer to Bayer AG?

Hi, I'm not clear why this article has moved. Will the same be done to [British Airways], [Pfizer] or [Sanofi] for example? it would seem to me that people know these companies by the primary name not their incorporation status but then I'm not familiar with Wiki policies. Thanks [[User:TomorrowsDream|TomorrowsDream]] ([[User talk:TomorrowsDream|talk]]) 11:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC) :Looks pretty contrary to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)]] standard guideline (not normally added unless disambiguating on it, and definitely the commonname for this term so it gets non-DAB title). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 12:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC) {{User:KoshVorlon/JFF}}

A question about a move

Hi. Did you have consensus in [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Lost_characters&diff=prev&oldid=439462858 doing this]? I recall there was a strong consensus against this move and I 'll suprpriced if the consensus changed. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 16:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Moldovan records in athletics etc

Hi Nono64. You made a movelog. But this just make sense if you do it for all national athletic record pages. So why? Greets. [[User:Montell 74|Montell 74]] ([[User talk:Montell 74|talk]]) 17:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Science disambiguation

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Science disambiguation]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Science disambiguation|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 22:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Biochemistry disambiguation

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Biochemistry disambiguation]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Biochemistry disambiguation|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 22:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:Tanning

What is the point of this new category? Tanning is just one, fairly narrow, aspect of leathermaking. I think it would be best to not create such a narrow category and fold tanning back into leathermaking where it belongs. [[User:Ferritecore|Ferritecore]] ([[User talk:Ferritecore|talk]]) 23:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Mill's

Hi! You appear to have done a large amount of editing this morning which has resulted in a number of errors, with changing of the wiki link '[[Mill]]' to [[Mill (grinding)]]. I assume you may have done these via a bot. I have reverted some of your edits, IE these articles:- *[[Coat of arms of Kirklees]] - the mills referred to are a mixture of textile ‎mills, IE cotton and woollens, as opposed to grinding mills. *[[Halifax, West Yorkshire]] - again these are textile mills, mostly woollen, with some cotton. *[[Old Mill (West Tisbury, Massachusetts)]] - the mill was initially a Grist Mill then a Woolen Mill, so a link to grinding mill is not appropriate. (NB: US spelling woolen used on the article, as opposed to British English use of Woollen). *[[Mill]] ‎I have replace your deletion of the link to [[Milling machine]] from that disambiguation page as the entry is correct. Note, as an example, in the English language it is correct to say "I will need to 'mill' this component". There may be more incorrect changes made by replacing the use of 'mill' with a general link to 'grinding mill', rather than a more specific wiki link to the type of mill referred to in the articles, as per:- [[Mill_(grinding)#Types_of_grinding_mills]], but I think that is really down to yourself to check and correct them. 11:16, 26 July 2011 (diff | hist) : Thanks! For the milling machine, I just moved it to the "milling" disambiguation page. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 13:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison of CECB units for deletion

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|42px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[Comparison of CECB units]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of CECB units]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --[[User:Gh87|Gh87]] ([[User talk:Gh87|talk]]) 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Physics disambiguation

A tag has been placed on [[Template:Physics disambiguation]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#T3|section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt><noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude></tt>). Thanks.  '''[[User:Mclay1|McLerristarr]] | [[User talk:Mclay1|Mclay1]]''' 06:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Letter-NumberCombination

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Letter-NumberCombination]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Letter-NumberCombination|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. — '''[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]''' [[User talk:SMcCandlish|Talk⇒]] ʕ(Õلō)ˀ [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|Contribs]]. 22:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Mandible

Hi Nono: Back in January 2011, you redirected the talk page for [[mandible]] to the [[human mandible]] article — and then wrote a more general article about mandibles. Would you mind if I now stopped the redirection of the talk page? Otherwise, we have no talk page for mandible itself. [[User:MeegsC|MeegsC]] | [[User talk:MeegsC|Talk]] 21:38, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Overlinking?

Some might consider the linking of lung to be overlinking. Has started a discussion. [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Linking_of_lung] Thanks [[User:Jmh649|'''Doc James''']] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 18:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC) ::One of the problems with many of these edits is these conditions can occur in any lung not just human ones and the link if linked at all should not restrict it to humans. [[User:Jmh649|'''Doc James''']] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 18:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC) :::I guess you where just changing a link rather than adding a link... [[User:Jmh649|'''Doc James''']] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 18:28, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Why move?

Hi, please see [[Talk:List_of_health_effects_of_wine#recent_move.3F]]. --[[User:Stefan|Stefan]] [[User_talk:Stefan|talk]] 04:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC) I have likewise reverted your analogous moves for [[List of health effects of tea]] and [[List of health effects of chocolate]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 07:22, 7 September 2011 (UTC) :And based on your extensive history of warnings for similar moves that have been disputed and that you have refused to discuss, I will block you the next time you make a move without discussion. '''You must slow down and get consensus first''' since it is clear your [[WP:BOLD]] is often controversial. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 07:27, 7 September 2011 (UTC) ::After the above warning, you have moved [[Polymnia (genus)]] to [[Polymnia (plant)]] with no evidence that you have discussed this on the article's talk page or consulted the relevant Wiki projects. This move would seem to be contrary to [[WP:FNAME]] which lists [[Morelia (genus)]] as an example. I am not certain, so I have started discussions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spiders#Recent_renaming_of_articles|here]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Animals#Recent_renaming_of_animal_articles|here]], and [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Recent_renaming_of_article|here]]. Regardless of the outcome of those discussions, I find your refusal to discuss potentially controversial page moves very disturbing and this behavior really needs to stop. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 02:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC) :::I have blocked for 48 hours to prevent ongoing disruption. Ultimately correct or not ''after discussion'', the lack of consensus-building after numerous editors have voiced concerns about your pattern here is a critical problem. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 03:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liz Madden

[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] The article [[Liz Madden]] has been [[WP:BLPPROD|proposed for deletion]] because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created '''[[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]''' must have at least one reference to a [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]] that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]], or ask at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Liz Madden|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 20:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

human eye-stub

{{sfdnotify1}} [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 14:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Anthropomorphic obsessive–compulsive disorder

This [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Template:Hormones&curid=3062273&diff=451882944&oldid=451882377 edit] is absurd. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 17:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC) :: OK, let me explain in a little more detail why I think changing the link from heart to human heart is inappropriate. The {{tl|hormones}} template and more specifically the [[Natriuretic peptide]] section of this template in turn links to [[atrial natriuretic peptide]] and [[brain natriuretic peptide]] that are both expressed in many other species besides human (see {{Homologene|4498}} and {{Homologene|81698}} respectively). Much of what we know about the human hormones comes from study of animal [[Ortholog#Orthology|orthologs]]. In addition, the animal orthologs are interesting in their own right. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 18:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC) ::: In particular, [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Epinephrine&diff=prev&oldid=451882715 this] is the one that popped up on my radar. Are you really claiming that this is a human-specific effect??? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 18:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC) :You have been warned extensively by many others about this long-term concern, yet you do not discuss or attempt to work towards [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. I have no choice but to prevent this on-going problem... <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 18:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)</div>

New Page Patrol survey

{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | [[File:NPPbarnstar.jpg|right|70px]] <big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big> ---- Hello Nono64! The [[WP:WMF|WMF]] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. * If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. * If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. '''Please click [https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9RSKYC9 HERE] to take part.''' Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. ---- You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Survey|NPP Survey]]. [[m:Global message delivery|Global message delivery]] 12:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |}

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Category:Polyphenol stubs

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Dawynn (talk) 12:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A1 Games

The article A1 Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company. Stub with one source for three years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thompson Is Right (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nono64. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

←