User talk:Noebse

Welcome

Hello, Noebse, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Noebse, ich würde mich freuen, wenn Sie mich nicht unter berühmte bzw. deutsche Psychologen aufführen und den Eintrag zu meiner Person wieder entfernen würden. Dies habe ich bereits einmal vor einiger Zeit selbst getan, aber - da Sie es wieder eingetragen haben - leider ohne Erfolg. Ich bin zwar Psychologin aber davon gibt es in Deutschland mehrere tausend und davon sind sicherlich einige hundert wesentlich wichtiger und berühmter als ich. Es ist mir peinlich dort aufgeführt zu sein und da ich keine Lust habe, mich ständig wieder selbst raus zu löschen, wäre ich Ihnen sehr verbunden, wenn Sie dies tun und mich auch zukünftig nicht wieder eintragen würden. Mit besten Grüßen Karen Zweyer

LGBT Categories

Hi, Noebse!

I noticed you recently added the Category:LGBT people from Germany to Sabine Braun, Martina Voss, and Imke Duplitzer‎. For Duplitzer, the article actually says she's a lesbian and there's a reliable source to back it up. For the other two, I've removed the category since there's no reference and the article doesn't even mention their sexuality. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edelhardt Rödelkoffer

What are the sources behind the person? I checked whatever books are available on the 1944 conspiracy and he's not there. Nothing on Google (with all spelling options). ?? NVO (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Edelhardt Rödelkoffer

A tag has been placed on Edelhardt Rödelkoffer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tokio bordell

A tag has been placed on Tokio bordell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HaeB (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bells

Bell-ringing of the protstant town church Saint Mary at Homberg/Efze needed to be moved if only because of the mis-spelling of protestant. I decided to move it to User:Noebse/sandbox because there is no precedent for articles about peals of bells. I recommend you to:

create an article Stadtkirche St. Marien, Homberg using the text in Homberg (Efze)
add a brief description of the bells - with no ogg files but link to …
a gallery of the ogg files on The Commons.

— RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Noebse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Nicole Struse - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done --Noebse (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lori Pfeiffer

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lori Pfeiffer. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Pfeiffer. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translating pages

Hi Noebse, and thanks for adding Jack Langedijk. I'd like to point out though that we need to reference the translation from other language Wikipedias to maintain the GFDL license of the source text. This can either be done by placing {{Translation/ref}} in the External links section (not in References!), or by putting {{Translated page}} on the talk page of the English article. Weiterhin viel Spaß, De728631 (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Germans in Cape Verde

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Germans in Cape Verde. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Germans in Cape Verde, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Can't I post a sourced article here any more. It's not a wiki, it's adminpedia. --00:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

"Most Germans in Cape Verde are beggars or failed musicians"? Did you use Google translate?? -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did so. But I wrote “most Germans in Cap Verde are escapists from civilisation or failed musicians.” --Noebse (talk) 18:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My memory fails me. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diether Krebs Unvergessen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diether Krebs Unvergessen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

German Block

Wie du siehst, arbeite ich sinnvoll mit. Überdenke bitte noch mal die Sperre. Der Username gefällt mir. --Noebse (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arschenloch

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Arschenloch, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 10:19, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Knackarsch

A tag has been placed on Knackarsch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A disambiguation page with no incoming links. The first link is of questionable relevance in an English-language encyclopedia. The second link does not redirect to a Wikipedia article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bazonka (talk) 19:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucas Hayward

The article Lucas Hayward has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only source appears to be self-sourced, and so obscure that alexa doesn't have enough data to evaluate it [1]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jacona (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Langedijk

The article Jack Langedijk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, only imdb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jacona (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Noebse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Noebse! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JayJay Jackpot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JayJay Jackpot, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hey, don’t add links to attack websites on a BLP as you did at Winston Sterzel [2]. Thats a violation a half dozen times over. I can only assume you made a mistake and didn’t even visit the content of the website before adding it (of course if you had visited the site and you did know about its comments we would be at ANI right now but I will of course AGF). I don’t think I’ve ever seen a clearer case of WP:COI. Please don’t edit another BLP until you understand our WP:BLP policy. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Heinrich Enckhausen is a good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fake News in the article de:Robert Baer in the German version of Wikipedia

Robert Baer [3] never wrote a book The Secret of the White house'],
The unreliable source Telepolis was used, which reproduced a fabricated interview. (Der Staat Jugoslawien stand dem strategischen Entwurf der USA im Wege Ex-CIA-Agent Robert Baer über die Strategien der CIA während des Jugoslawien-Krieges)
Like some other propaganda websites Secrets of the White House - Confession of a CIA Agent, azvizion.az, 24 December 2015
A fictional interview with a former CIA agent has been circulating in the Balkans for a decade, Raskrinkavanje.ba (BiH), seecheck.org, March 24, 2023
Cupurdija claimed that he interviewed Baer in Canada, where he was promoting the book “The secret of the White House”. Baer never wrote or promoted such a book, nor was he in Canada at the time the interview was published. On the other hand, Baer did publish several books about his experiences working for this agency, in which he never claimed anything close to what the obscure author of the fake interview wrote. Finally, Robert Baer confirmed for Raskrinkavanje that he never gave the said interview.Intervju sa Robertom Baerom - Kraj Jugoslavije PDF Štampa El. pošta, Napisao Miloš Ćupurdija, četvrtak, 06 septembar 2012--Noebse (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Ann-Kathrin Bendixen

Hello Noebse! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ann-Kathrin Bendixen, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann-Kathrin_Bendixen, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Ann-Kathrin Bendixen and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Ann-Kathrin Bendixen, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ann-Kathrin Bendixen. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Ann-Kathrin Bendixen with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ann-Kathrin Bendixen saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ɱ 19:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ɱ 19:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for cross-wiki harassment (Special:Permalink/1174014897#User:Noebse at ANI).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PETO - Die junge Alternative (logo).gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PETO - Die junge Alternative (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]