User talk:Nodar95/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Beijing, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. The Tartanator 06:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting interpretation of a Wikipedia Internal link as original research. Nodar95 (talk) 18:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Out of all of my readings on the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, nowhere have I seen that claim. And do not assume that merely adding sources will do you any good. The Tartanator 04:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Beijing. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "Censorship"...bluntly put, this is absolutely disgusting and shows that you are in the same class as the rudest and most unpleasant editors here on Wikipedia The Tartanator 04:14, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good luck trying to hide China's history to the rest of the world. Nodar95 (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yet you continue to accuse me of censorship, and even reporting me to the vandalism noticeboard. My motives have been [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beijing&diff=prev&oldid=462987681 made perfectly clear at the talk page. Now enough is enough. The Tartanator 00:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- That reporting seemed to have been the right move as they stopped (for now??) your censoring on both the article and discussion page (interesting that you even censored the discussion). Next time consider wikipedia policies and don't try to silence discussion.Nodar95 (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Next time do not be so foolish as to accuse someone else of "censorship". Making a talk page post full of personal attacks is enough cause (Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks) to having your mouth shut, as is what happened with the initial removal of your section. The Tartanator 01:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
At 22:13, 30 November 2011 the account of The Tartanator was blocked (1) for 1 week for edit warring, attempt to game Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection and 3RR. Nodar95 (talk) 17:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
The Tartanator retired his account and from the attemptto have this talk page cleared by User:Guerrilla_of_the_Renmin one can assume that he is now contributing under that name. Nodar95 (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Judging from Tartanator's behaviour, if I really were him, I would have attempted to remove your last post here from January 17 and would not have waited for over 3 weeks to attempt to have this talk page cleared. Not to mention the fact that you have yet to (maybe never will be able to) provide real evidence linking me with Tartanator. I am interested in building the lists that I have been building, while he has put in no work at all. Looking at Tartanator's full record, my account was created while his block was in place, so in effect you are accusing me of sockpuppetry; a serious accusation like this with no supporting evidence at all is a huge no-no. GotR Talk 03:05, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
It is now confirmed that The Tartanator and GotR Talk are controlled by the same user and that this was a case of sockpuppetry. More details here actually revealed that this is at least his fourth account. Nodar95 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Beijing
There is a discussion going on at Talk:Beijing that you may want to participate in. 02:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Epidermis (skin) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Receptor, Stress, Tissue, Development, Vessels, Hydration, Mechanical, Golgi, Shunt and Barrier
- Dermis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Matrix, Stress, Tissue, Elasticity and Strength
- Corneocyte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Cell, Cells and Polyhedral
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you dear Bot. Nodar95 (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |