User talk:Noahedits

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manmohan Bawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travelogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph A. Montalbano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward O'Neill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Noahhoward. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isha Ambani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Isha Ambani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Obviously it wasn't a repost; G4 covers pages that are the same as ones that have been deleted in the past, not new pages on the same topics as pages that have been deleted. However, this article didn't have anything significant beyond what was deleted before, and since the voters at the deletion discussion considered those sources and facts insufficient, I can't see why those sources and facts should now be seen as sufficient for protecting the article from deletion. I'm keeping this message cursory because I suppose you don't want a lot of detail, but if you do want more detail, let me know and I'll explain more fully. Nyttend (talk) 06:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Intimism

Hi! Were you thinking of converting intimism to a disambiguation page? If not, then there's really no reason to have moved intimism (poetic movement) to its current location: if the poetic movement is the primary topic for the term, which having the term redirect there suggests it is, then the parenthetical disambiguation ("poetic movement") in the title is unnecessary. We should either have intimism as a disambiguation page, which would reflect there being no primary topic, or have either the article about the poetic movement or the article about the art movement at that location. I'm not particularly familiar with either movement, and I don't know what the primary topic is, so I'd welcome your thoughts. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@Arms & Hearts: Hey! I think a disambiguation page might be a good idea as neither article seems significantly more notable than the other. Would a disambiguation page make sense for only two pages however? What do you think? Noahhoward (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! Yes, a disambiguation page for two articles is fine – see WP:NOPRIMARY. I'll go ahead and make it now. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CodigoDelSur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Aouint Lahna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aouint Lahna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Britishfinance: I've added some citations if you want to check the article out. Noahhoward (talk) 17:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Not John Wagner

Dear Noah Howard,
I see you may have been mistaken. You may have seen that John1427 is my username and concluded that my identity was violating the rules of self-posting. I will be changing the name to avoid this mistake in the future.
Yours truly, John1427 (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Yes, Jesus John1427 (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Jesus! John1427 (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aouint Lahna has been accepted

Aouint Lahna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Newslinger talk 10:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Aouint Lahna) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aouint Lahna.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Well constructed stub!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 11:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Bottom slip

You blanked the lead at Chiang Kai-shek....I take it this was an error aND reverted .--Moxy (talk) 00:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@Moxy: Oh dang that was not intentional. I meant to fix a grammatical error on mobile and the app must've glitched out. Sorry about that. Noahhoward (talk) 02:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Diebenkorn Reclining Nude.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Tête d’otage No. 14 (Head of a Hostage No. 14).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Alain Jacquet Déjeuner sur l'herbe.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Diebenkorn Reclining Nude.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Diebenkorn Reclining Nude.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Good work

Hi, by chance I saw the article you recently made about Ivan Zemljak. Good stuff, keep it up! Yakikaki (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

@Yakikaki: Thanks man! Noahhoward (talk) 20:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, When you create an article at at disambiguated title like Arco (lamp), please remember to add a link to the disambiguation page at the base title - in this case Arco. I've done it for this one. Sometimes it will be a case of adding a "hatnote", if there's only a single existing article. Either way, it helps the reader to find the article and reduces the chance that a future careless editor will create a duplicate at Arco (light). Thanks. PamD 16:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Nice work!

Just wanted to say I've seen a few of your articles and it's great to see so many high-quality contributions from a (relatively) new editor. Keep up the great work, and please never hesitate to ask for anything!--MainlyTwelve (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

@MainlyTwelve: Hey thank you so much! I really appreciate it.

Wiki linking of "Nihlism"?

This is a bit of a nit-picky question, but during your Six Heretical Teachers expansion, you included the piped wiki link [[Nihilism|nihlism]]. This seems odd to me because it links directly to the article "nihilism" but displays the misspelling "nihlism" (additionally, nihlism redirects to the common spelling). Why did you pipe the link like this?

I accidentally initially sent this message to the wrong person. e^πi (talk | contribs) 21:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaty of La Pointe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicoleño, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chumash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Moses Bahelfer) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Moses Bahelfer.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Moses Bahelfer.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Southern Carrier language

Hello,

If you made the article Southern Carrier (language) from scratch at that title, I think it would have been better to place it at Southern Carrier language over the redirect that currently exists there. It is possible to edit the contents of a redirect page and turn it into a full-fledged article (see here for example), and that saves a great deal of hassle with page moves. (I have requested a move to the current title, so don't worry about that.)

If, however, you wrote the contents of that page elsewhere (on your sandbox, in a draft) and then moved it to its current location, then disregard everything I just said before; we need page histories to be together for copyright purposes, and cut-and-paste moves are bad for that reason. In any event the article itself looks decent, keep up the good work!

– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@John M Wolfson: I'm confused. If I didn't make the article in the sandbox what should I do with the contents. Copy and paste the text into the Southern Carrier language page and change Southern Carrier (language) to a redirect to that page? Let me know or feel free do do it yourself. Thank you! Noahedits (talk) 03:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

This is only for future reference!! If you have an article whose title would be best at "X", which is currently serving as a redirect, and you haven't placed the content anywhere else on Wikipedia it might be easier to make the page directly at "X" so that you don't have to request a move later. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Tefillin Barbie

Can you say why you linked tefillin to Tefillin Barbie in this edit? Jayjg ^(talk) 19:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jayjg: That was definitely a mistake. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noahedits (talk • contribs)

So are you going to fix it? Jayjg ^(talk) 22:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is for all the phantastic maps! I have many language family articles on my watchlist, which is not always a pleasure. However, seeing "Noahedits" there always guarantees for a positive experience :) Austronesier (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

The new map

Hi Noahedits. As far as I can see, the map you uploaded is mostly a synthesis of highly questionable demographic maps (almost all of these maps are own works of other Wikipedia editors and a good part of them contain falsified data) and some SCW maps on WP. I know you were trying to improve the article, but for the reasons I mentioned, I had to undo your edits. When you decide to upload a new version of the map, please ping me - I would like to help. Puduḫepa 18:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Puduhepa:, I am not sure what you mean that my map is mostly a synthesis of "own works of other Wikipedia editors," the majority of my data came from Ethnologue which while ethically questionable in its motives, is a relatively respected source (and by far the most detailed one) when it comes to the distribution of languages in the world. For example, the distribution of the Chadic languages of Cameroon is directly adapted from Ethnologue's map of Northern Cameroon. Can you clarify what you mean by your comment by any chance? Thank you Noahedits (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. Turkey, Syria, and Iraq parts have errors and the Turkish part seems like a copy of one of the demographic maps of Turkey on WP. Some issues:

1) Hatay, which has significant Arab-speaking population (mainly Alawite) is omitted.

2) Some Arab-speaking areas in northern Syria are omitted.

4) There is *no* Semitic-speaking region in Van province of Turkey.

5) Mosul is a predominately Arab-speaking area.

... and more. Yes, the map has some errors. Feel free to upload a new and more accurate one. And as I said above, please ping me - I'd like to help by providing sources. The previous map is not perfect either, but has less errors.Puduḫepa 19:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Puduḫepa: If you can provide me with two or more reliable sources on Northern Syria and Iraq that I can cross reference I would be happy to update the map (the former map, however, remains far less perfect when it comes to the distribution of Arabic in greater Syria, not to mention the entirely generalized distribution of Chadic languages). As for Van, the province has small pockets of Neo Aramaic speaking populations.[1][2]. As for Hatay, Arabic is spoken as a minority language and even within the Arab community, used to varying degrees. While I by no means support the language policy of Turkey, this is the reality of the situation in Hatay. While other minority languages are referenced in the map, all are their own distinct languages, unlike Arabic which is spoken directly across the border in neighboring Syria (see Hausa for another example of a language confined to its core population as opposed to minority and second language areas). Additionally, Mosul is marked in the North Mesopotamian Arabic area (go to the label for "Judeo Arabic" in Northern Syria and look directly to your left. Noahedits (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Due to the mass migration from these two countries, it's hard to find a current RS about the demographics but checking the pre-SCW maps would be the most appropriate action. There are about one million Semitic/Arabic-speakers living mainly in the southern parts of Hatay and they certainly deserve a mention. Please check Alawites. As for Van, I have copious sources about the demographics and I have never seen one single info supporting this. There might be an extremely small minority as in Elazığ, though. Will do more search and then will write my comment on this stuff. Puduḫepa 22:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Puduhepa:, Noahedits originally pinged me by mistake, this is just to make sure you receive a ping. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

@Puduḫepa: :P – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Geography Barnstar

		The Geography Barnstar
		Fabulous language maps! Language articles on Wikipedia have benefited tremendously from your carefully crafted maps. Keep up the great work! — Sagotreespirit (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sagotreespirit: Thank you so much! Let me know if if you have any maps you think would be worth making/updating. I'd love to have a project to work on during quarantine.

@Sagotreespirit: Try making more maps of language families in Melanesia. It's not easy to find good maps for Papuan languages. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 04:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Request: can you please do a map for Languages of Sulawesi? You can use e.g. this source. –Austronesier (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@Austronesier: Check out the South Sulawesi languages :). Ill hopefully have time to finish a larger one soon.

Great, thanks! Can't wait to see more. –Austronesier (talk) 08:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Cushitic Language Maps

Very nice maps! Lovely addition. Thank you. Pathawi (talk) 04:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Agreed! But the location of Burji is off - it is a small language mostly spoken in Ethiopia - only about 10,000 speak it in Kenya, so it shouldn't be that prominent on the map. What you have as Burji here is where I would place the Borana language, a cross-border variety of Oromo. Landroving Linguist (talk) 07:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@Pathawi: Thank you! Let me know if you have any language maps you think Wikipedia would benefit from. I'd love to make more. Noahedits (talk) 17:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@Landroving Linguist: Fixed! I'm at the mercy of sub-optimal sources so your vigilance is much appreciated.Noahedits (talk) 17:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Macro-Jê languages

If you have time, you can try making a map of Macro-Jê languages#Nikulin (2020). There's a map on page 28 of this PDF file. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 17:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Architecture of Algeria

Hi, I have created a little start article on the Villa Montfeld. I don't know whether you are based in Algiers, but I see you are the main author of the Architecture of Algeria article. Montfeld would be much improved by a photo of the villa. That said, you could easily be based in California, or even if you are in Algiers, the American ambassador may not readily welcome camera-totting Wikipedia editors. So, the long and the short, do you have any idea where I may access an image? Thanks in advance. KJP1 (talk) 12:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

It's great to hear from you, @KJP1:. Unfortunately, I am based in the U.S. have neither photographs of the residence nor plans to visit Algiers in the near future. With that said, I'll do some poking around to see if I can find any historic photos of the structure or a contact in Algiers of whom I might be able to ask a favor. Thanks for reaching out and helping to produce robust coverage of the architectural heritage of the Maghreb! Noahedits (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Correction

Hi! I don't know how free you must be at the moment, I saw that you had a notice saying that you were at school at the moment. Regardless, I thought it would be best to give you a heads up regarding the file c:File:Iñupiaq language map.svg, it seems that you have erroneously labelled the Northwest Territories as the Yukon and vice versa (Yukon is the one who borders Alaska). It's a small change but I thought it would be best to reach out to let you know so it could be rectified. Hope you have a wonderful day! Ornithoptera (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)