User talk:Noa Shoham

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Noa Shoham

Thank you for creating Ludwig Wörl.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you please try to add a source, such as a reliable German newspaper archive to help improve the notability of the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 14:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ludwig Wörl

The article Ludwig Wörl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While heroic, not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show they pass notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ludwig Wörl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ludwig Wörl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludwig Wörl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]