Jump to content

User talk:No malingmaling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.

recent edits

[edit]

could you please discuss these edits regarding origin of regional culinary on the talk page? thank you, Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been discussed since long time ago by several countries, this is Southern Chinese dish, not clown Malaysia. (No malingmaling (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]

we appreciate the time you're spending to keep the encyclopedia accurate. please don't use the article to disparage other world regions. have a Wikipedia day!

Saintstephen000 (talk) 19:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bak kut teh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. William Avery (talk) 18:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bak kut teh. Roundishtc) 19:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bak kut teh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Roundishtc) 19:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster talk 19:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eiskrahablo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 16:33, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]