User talk:No autoaim

Welcome!

Hello, No autoaim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like English National Resistance, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 09:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of English National Resistance

A tag has been placed on English National Resistance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 09:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown

You will surely be aware that people born in one country can gain citizenship in another. She was born in Uganda but is still British. Do take care not to let your personal prejudice affect your editing. Fences&Windows 19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John Tyndall. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 22:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic labelling

Why do you find it necessary to add thje term "Jewish" to the biographies of socialist leaders -- some of them not even with any Jewish ancestry? What difference do yoiu think this made to their lives or activism? Please justify adding this description before continuing to do so. RolandR (talk) 19:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

my reply is I think it is significant knowledge that the German revolution was lead by a small minority of the country & wiki shouldn't hide that.Which weren't Jewish then? paul ,leo & clara must have been, I don't see any reasons to doubt communist websites(no communist source for clara though, but I remember it). I was sure karl was but i can't remember what I read about Him now.

The German revolution was not led by "the Jews", and it is a racist smear to allege that it was.RolandR (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it called spartacist uprising aswell, the main founder & leader of the party was, & almost a majority, atleast, of the other members were.No autoaim (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Griffin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you propose such changes on the article's Talk page. Rodhull andemu 02:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Alhambra Decree has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Alhambra Decree, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling another editor a liar is an unacceptable breach of Wikipedia's rules. If you repeat this, I shall report you . and you should expect an appropriate sanction RolandR (talk) 14:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]