User talk:Nmcritchley01
This is Nmcritchley01's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shenandoah salamander (April 18)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shenandoah salamander and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shenandoah salamander, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Nmcritchley01!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
|
Thanks for expanding Shenandoah salamander. I understand it may have been for a conservation course, but Wikiepdia is a general encyclopedia, and the article lends far too much coverage and needless detail to conservation. Neutral point of view means in part that aspects of topics should be treated in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources (see WP:PROPORTION). An article can be 100% factually true, but still unbalanced. Your sections on Conservation can be condensed and summarized into probably a few paragraphs, without going into intricate detail on individual researchers, documents, or relatively trivial exact dates. I have condensed some, but also be wary of inadvertently presenting arguments or opinions (e.g. from Center for Biological Diversity) as facts, especially if they give disproportionate emphasis to any views. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Shenandoah salamander
[edit]Hello, Nmcritchley01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shenandoah salamander, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Shenandoah salamander
[edit]Hello, Nmcritchley01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shenandoah salamander".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)