User talk:Nis pero

Poll

Hi! Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [1] SilkTork 12:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beerbox

Hi there, Nis pero. I just wanted to let you know about the new {{Infobox Beer}}. It is a single template solution to the problem solved by the individual "beerbox" templates. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beer#Beer and brewery infoboxes, Category:WikiProject Beer templates for discussion. Mike Dillon 22:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SchneiderWeisse.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:SchneiderWeisse.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nis pero! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Doris Raecke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doris Raecke

The article Doris Raecke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP that has been here since 2007 without any citations. No significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Paulaner.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Paulaner.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SchneiderWeisse.PNG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SchneiderWeisse.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Ich (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SchneiderWeisse.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SchneiderWeisse.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]