User talk:Nirdis

 Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Falan Andrea 2 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Falan Andrea. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.  Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Please consider placing the template:[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Falan Andrea

A tag has been placed on Falan Andrea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no content in the page and an wikipedia article already exists for the same topic

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nirdis (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Nirdis, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Sri Lankan musicians have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Sri Lankan musicians was changed by Nirdis (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866874 on 2021-07-27T18:05:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nirdis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP: MUSICBIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 15:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:MUSICBIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CodeLyoko was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still fails WP:MUSICBIO, seeing its been declined 4 times without much improvement, I am rejecting the article

CodeLyoko^talk 17:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Falan Andrea instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qwerfjkl was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Falan Andrea instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

―Qwerfjkl talk 21:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello Nirdis. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Falan Andrea, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nirdis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nirdis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not compensated for my edits. I'm just a big fan of Falan Andrea. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 15:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't go removing maintenance tags from the page, as you have done for the fourth time on this article. You have not made any edits to address the issues with your last removcal. Doing so is disruptive as the sources included don't lead her to meet the general notability guideline. I'll leave it for someone else to add back the notability tag, but if they add it I warn you not to remove it without making substantial improvements. Doing so again may be seen as disruptive. I have added a maintenance tag to address the issue of the article being written from a fan's point of view. For example, "Falan faced it really well, not getting her music career or decency affected by it" is not from a neutral point of view. This, with many other sentences, need improvement to be encyclopedic. If you do remove this tag, then it will disadvantage the article as this places it in cleanup categories designed to allow other editors to improve on your work to make the article more encyclopedic. Removal of the tag may also be seen as disruptive, as in it's current state the article needs improvement. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I get it. Thank you very much.

Nirdis (talk) 13:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me to write this article in a neutral point of view? I changed the sentence you mentioned. I can not find another issue. If you can, please help. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Examples:

Just after the win, there was an immense backlash on social medias questioning Falan's win and making false accusations of her, from the angry fans of the first runner-up of the competition. should really be something like After she won the competition she received criticism for how she sang, what she wore and for in the opinion of the critics not being talented enough to be crowned the winner. However, this sentence needs further sourcing as the source that was included was an interview. Ideally something which isn't an interview needs to be included to source this sentence.
She is the winner of ninth season of popular Sri Lankan reality show Derana Dream Star should really be something like She won the ninth season of the Sir Lankan reality show Derana Dream Star. The important change is the removal of "popular" as the source does not say that this particular show is popular.

I've gone around the article to mark places for improvement or made the changes needed. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. Nirdis (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know can we add youtube videos as references? Nirdis (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Depends. If it's reliable it should be okay. That means something like a news organisation YouTube video, however, textual references are generally used over video. Also I've added back the fan point of view as the win sentence isn't from a neutral point of view. Things like "immense backlash" isn't from a neutral point of view. I suggest that you leave removing the maintenance tags to other editors. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I made the changes to article to be in neutral point of view. Can you please consider removing the maintenance tag? Thank you very much again. Nirdis (talk) 12:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please remove the maintenance tag? Thank you Nirdis (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The major fan point of view issues have been addressed, but as several statements are unsourced I've replaced it with the {{BLP more sources}} tag as biographies of living persons, because they cover a living person, need to have reliable sources supporting information in the article. For example, Her first original song is a collaboration with Pop Punk, named "Me Dase Mage Wedana" which was released in May, 2020. is unsourced so needs a source. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you very much. I'll try to find mire reliable sources. Nirdis (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Falan Andrea moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Falan Andrea, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition it appears you have a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI concern,please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move the article into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea 2 (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots of Press Releases, not much independent sourcing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Portal:Sri Lanka, you may be blocked from editing. --Chanaka L (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen again. That was a mistake. Nirdis (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Falan Andrea 4. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen again. Nirdis (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen. Nirdis (talk) 10:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Falan Andrea Jansen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Falan Andrea Jansen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, you appear to have a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI concern, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your COI/UPE, do not move the article back into mainspace yourself. You must go through the AfC process. If you continue your disruptive editing, it could lead to you getting blocked. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to move articles like this to draft space, there are articles which have like one reliable reference. I found some articles that you have contributed only have one reference. Why you don't move them to draft space? Nirdis (talk) 12:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has no UPE/COI matter. All of the sentences are in neutral point of view. If there is can you just show me where they are and you can see this is not a very little article. I spend my time on it. It's not fair that you move articles like this. Nirdis (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your move. Moving to mainspace again would be considered move warring which may lead to you being blocked. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's all of your issue with this article? There are articles which have very little references. Nirdis (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That Onel5969 should be clearly reported. Nirdis (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamy Jazz and Onel5969 per WP:DRAFTOBJECT I think if and when Nirdis moves it back again, it will likely need to be resolved at AfD. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Nirdis is entitled to an AfD. I'd struggle to see it passing AfD since the current version is no better than the repeatedly declined and, eventually, rejected draft anyway. The sources are poor. I agree that WP:UPE is at play here as well. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone - from prior experience, the one exception to DRAFTOBJECT is if you are dealing with UPE. This particular editor clearly has a UPE conflict, far beyond that of a "diehard fan". UPE should always go through AfC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair, I didn't know that existed, but I think a AfC review would probably help as there have been multiple AfC declines by many editors so far. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm not paid. I'm just a diehard fan of Falan Andrea. But I believe my article is in very very neutral point of view. Nirdis (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UPE. Is it okay to use smiley faces?? 🤣🤣🤣 Nirdis (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You people choose one well written article to fight with. There are hundreds of them very poorly written and with like one reference. I think you people are not suitable as administrators. Nirdis (talk) 13:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for an AfC reviewer to judge the article. If it's good, it'll be accepted. If there are issues with it, these will be pointed out. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Onel5969 person couldn't point out one sentence that supports his COI/UPE concern, but just keeps talking about it. I think they have been paid for removing this article. Others should look into that matter. Nirdis (talk) 14:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamy Jazz please note that this has been moved back to mainspace again - now at Falan Andrea Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea Jansen (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Falan Andrea, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nirdis. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Falan Andrea 1

Hello, Nirdis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Falan Andrea 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Falan Andrea

Hello, Nirdis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Falan Andrea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]