User talk:Nintendude

See Archive 1 for the old discussion.

Hey

Hey fan, I'm glad you like my goofy content on Newgrounds. Anyway, I will continue to eat poop. J/K --Kittyslasher | Page | contact 16:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for two weeks (fourteen days) for running Kittyslasher as an abusive sockpuppet. Please refrain from this sort of behavior, or your block next time around will almost surely be indefinite. SushiGeek 23:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Secdis

Template:Secdis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. BigBlueFish 18:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your signature

Using images in your signature is generally discouraged. Please remove the Image:Nintendude.png image from your signature line. You can include it on your userpage if you like.

Thanks - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 15:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Sucks poop"

Will you please stop adding "... sucks poop" to every AFD article you can possibly find? It's a poor reason to support or oppose anything, and I will begin vandalism warnings the next time I see it. Thanks -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Synonyms for feces

I don't think Category:Synonyms for feces is an appropriate category for an encyclopedia. A list of synonyms is better suited for a thesaurus. Would you consider removing this category? Powers ^T 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Wiktionarydis

Template:Wiktionarydis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Srleffler 02:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shitty page moves

I've already sorted out some of your random shitty page moves at High fidelity and A Date with Elvis (which was also described as the admin sorting it out as vandalism). You are going to have to tell me why Adolfo should be moved to Adolfo, Brazil. If you're going to move something to a different title, you're going to have to leave something in its place other than a redirect, or else, the page move IS USELESS. All you're doing is inserting a redirect in for no reason. If you look at the Adolfo, Brazil page, you'll see that someone even had the thought of putting in a dab notice at the top, that is what you should have done, instead of moving the thing. I'm now going to have to get an admin to sort it out. Why the fuck you thought Adolfo was more suited as a redirect to Adolph, I don't know. But consider this a warning. I've had to sort out quite a few of your absolutely awesome articles on newgrounds webspam already, and voted to shoot down your ridiculous categories. - Hahnch e n 15:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked.

After reading some of the stuff on your talk page, I've decided to block you for a day. Please take Wikipedia a little more seriously. 1ne 23:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Samsonite

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Johnny Samsonite, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Johnny Samsonite. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - CobaltBlueTony 17:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Stories

You can't just make this crap up, San Andreas Stories hasn't been comfirmed or anything, in the future don't make articles based on speculation, Wikipedia is not a cystall ball--Coasttocoast 02:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've disrupted Wikipedia for long enough. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Poo_poo_blowjob was the final straw. -- Netsnipe ► 01:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank fuck for that, I was about to go to RFCU over User:ZFU738 and User:Clarenceville Trojan to get this guy banned. Seriously Nintendude, in every day conversation can you not help but bring up the subject of eating shit? I've had to delete quite a lot of your stuff before, and popped back to your contrib tree after seeing Category:Famous uncompiled computer games. Awesomeblades. - Hahnch e n 04:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nintendude.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nintendude.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 17:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nintendude.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nintendude.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 17:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tits McGee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. YUL89YYZ 11:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of List of dances with dedicated songs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of dances with dedicated songs, by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of dances with dedicated songs is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of dances with dedicated songs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate List of dances with dedicated songs itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ht-//dig

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ht-//dig, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:FEUS

Template:FEUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master son^{T - C} 23:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Portaldata

Template:Portaldata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Fayenatic (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M016.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:M016.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 09:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Homonymdis

A tag has been placed on Template:Homonymdis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dance hits party pack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dance hits party pack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Category:Funk-based hip hop songs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Funk-based hip hop songs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Funk-based hip hop songs is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Funk-based hip hop songs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Burn rubber

I have nominated Burn rubber, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burn rubber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Clarityfiend (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Document

Template:Document has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. BJ^Talk 04:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Highwaygothic.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Highwaygothic.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Wronguser

Template:Wronguser has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stereogram Tut Animated Shark Small.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Stereogram Tut Animated Shark Small.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Vaporware operating systems

I have nominated Category:Vaporware operating systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Pcap ping 12:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Blues Brothers

Proposed deletion of Pelican Accessories

The article Pelican Accessories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable company (WP:N) - article does not attribute reliable secondary sources (WP:V)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marasmusine (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ZOOMBOX

The article ZOOMBOX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Product with no secondary sources with which to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 10:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hash

Template:Hash has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitendo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikitendo. Since you had some involvement with the Wikitendo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of expressways in Michigan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of expressways in Michigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of expressways in Michigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 02:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Sexual references in popular culture

Category:Sexual references in popular culture, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lovers' lane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovers' lane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovers' lane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 05:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reba. Since you had some involvement with the Reba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Hoops gza (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitendo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikitendo. Since you had some involvement with the Wikitendo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 20:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of freeways in Michigan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of freeways in Michigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of freeways in Michigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 03:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ニサ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ニサ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ニサ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ego White Tray (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pelican Accessories

Hello Nintendude. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Pelican Accessories".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Pelican Accessories}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 05:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiintendo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiintendo. Since you had some involvement with the Wiintendo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst ✈ 15:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keen4screenshot.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keen4screenshot.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of platforms Linux is ported for listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of platforms Linux is ported for. Since you had some involvement with the List of platforms Linux is ported for redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hybrid video game consoles

A tag has been placed on Category:Hybrid video game consoles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 13:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ニンテンドー listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ニンテンドー. Since you had some involvement with the ニンテンドー redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IQuest

The article IQuest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage or critical attention in independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Schoenherr Road

The article Schoenherr Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

uncited for 11 years, and this doesn't pass WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 01:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kidz Bop albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Kidz Bop albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Wiintendo" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiintendo. Since you had some involvement with the Wiintendo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wario (series) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Wario (series) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outer Drive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outer Drive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outer Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metropolitan Parkway (Detroit area) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metropolitan Parkway (Detroit area) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Parkway (Detroit area) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neo Geo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neo Geo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Geo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TarkusAB^talk/contrib 01:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]