User talk:Ninos2576

Hello Ninos2576! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Ninos2576, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ninos2576! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I believe the issue before was not that I didn't include a reliable source, but rather that a source wasn't included at all. However, I have added a reliable source to my previous edit. Thank you again. Ninos2576 (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

A lengthy welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Citing Sources and Notability Suggestion

Hi. Thank you for creating the page Iraqi Christian Relief Council. In it you have listed many sources but have used naked url's which are both unsightly and problematic. If somebody else wants to follow a link to the source a naked URL is not a user-friendly way to get here. Please could you take a look at the info on how to cite sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources and the tutorial. I see other editors have mentioned this to you before.

Please also have a look at Wikipedia:Single-purpose account.

Once again, thanks for the new page and Welcome to Wikipedia! Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 16:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your edit on the Tyari page. Away Inn (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

You are welcome! Ninos2576 (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hi Ninos2576! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. You mark almost all of your edits as "minor". Please only do so for really basic things like correcting a misspelling or fixing punctuation. Schazjmd (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. Will be sure to fix that in the future Ninos2576 (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Warning on neutral point of view and reliable sources

You were warned by Hipal previously. I am repeating it: do not add unreliable sources such as Twitter posts by ordinary accounts, circular references, unreliable websites, YouTube accounts, and so forth; do not cherry pick or falsify them, and take a look at neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. Persistent additions of unreliable sources and slow-burning edit wars to keep your preferred version of pages as you did in F. Murray Abraham and more recently in Peshmerga are disruptive.--217.131.86.187 (talk) 14:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assyrian Policy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Atour Sargon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atour Sargon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I modified your second comment on WP:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon. You can only enter keep or delete once in a discussion, so I changed your second keep to comment. Schazjmd (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Puduḫepa 05:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

kingdom of osroene

The inhabitants of osroene was mainly arameans, greeks and parthians. The king abgar might have been arab. I am not a patriot, l am neutral and open minded. According to simo parpola they had an assyrian identity, now should we trust him? l would say yes because we know that the arameans worshipped mesopotamian gods. And our church fathers accepted both aramean and assyrian for our identity. Now how trustworthy were our church fathers, well, not very much but they could have documents describing the syriac people as arameans or assyrians, but what we know from other historians during this time we have been called both arameans and assyrian, while l mostly accept the assyrian identity because it was our last true empire. But back to my question, do you think that the kingdom of osroene should be written as our kingdom, for mostly they were aramean and other mixes, and other people can say its their kingdom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)