User talk:Ninja247

Welcome

Hello, Ninja247! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Polly (Parrot) 02:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Casablanca has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cubs197 (talk) 07:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 09:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar. It is a bit tricky with faith-based articles or pages dealing with religion - the important issue is that it must be written in a neutral (NPOV) way; many LDS & non-LDS happily work together to create what are fair, balanced encyclopedic articles. Certain words are avoided so that it passes this test of being non-POV (point of view), and that everything is qualified with mainstream, bona fide references. All the best, A Sniper (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding large numbers of links to pages that do not exits is not helpful for readers. Also keep in mind that Wikipedia strives to be neutral.--dbolton (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most hymns and most people do not meet the notability requirements for an encyclopedia article. Adding large numbers of red links reduces the quality of the experience for the reader. Generally red links should be pretty rare and only link to topics that are clearly notable in their own right. See also Wikipedia:Red link. --dbolton (talk) 23:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to All About the Mormons?, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

Hello Ninja247,
on Henrik's talk page you wrote "I want to build a bot. Where do i get started with that?" See Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot for a starting point. If you should mean a bot that is to use our statistical data, please refine your question/request. --- Kind regards, Melancholie (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Indiana University (Bloomington) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.--Auric (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Bryan Burrough

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Bryan Burrough, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bryanburrough.com/the-author/. As a copyright violation, Bryan Burrough appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Bryan Burrough has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bryan Burrough and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bryan Burrough with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bryan Burrough.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenGourd (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PUA

I'd recommend you start off by looking at fastseduction.com (also these two commercial sites are good: rsdnation.com & vindicarlo.com) but most importantly find out about your local lair and join up with them :) wishing you the best of luck! any more questions feel free to ask away Mathmo ^Talk 06:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Barnstar

Please note that, before archiving, I placed your kind barnstar on my User page. Thank you for your encouragement. WBardwin (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page First Presidency has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 21:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goolsbee

I've reverted your last edit at Austan Goolsbee, since he hasn't vacated his position yet. -- Scjessey (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben Swann

The article Ben Swann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Evaders99 (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ninja247. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page move - John Beck

Hi - This is just a heads up that article titles are usually written in sentence case, so John Beck (American Football) should really be John Beck (American football) since football is a common noun. I haven't changed it yet because I'm not sure whether people will like the move in general. Some people prefer the term gridiron football, probably because the game is played professionally in both the US and Canada. I just thought I would give you a shout in case you see the title change. EricEnfermero (Talk) 21:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the headsup. I agree with the capitalization. Of the three major sports(Baseball, Basketball) in the United States, football is the least that is participated in by Canadians. A professional team doesn't exist in Canada yet e.g. Futbal Americano or any other translation of that phrase is well recognized internationally as opposed to gridiron football. Gridiron football has strong connotation to the penal system.

Speedy deletion nomination of BYU Technology Transfer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BYU Technology Transfer, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 06:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why was most of the article deleted? the sources were significant. I'm not sure what's going on here.

I deleted half the article because the content was directly copy-pasted from the sources. Content on Wikipedia cannot be taken word for word from sources. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 07:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

then think about that next time it causes an article to be speedily deleted. All the sources were deleted. Edit the content if the deletion of there is a potential of deleting an article.

January 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with BYU Technology Transfer. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 07:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ninja247. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ninja247. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"See also" lists

Hey, I see you've just lately been writing a lot of "See also" lists for various pages, where in many cases the items on the lists don't have much to do with the main topic of the article. I mean, for a lot of them I can see how the one would subjectively remind someone of the other, but that's not good enough grounds to connect them on Wikipedia. I presume you're not doing this to promulgate a theory of your own that they are connected, as that would be WP:OR. Everything on Wikipedia needs to be grounded in existing research. Hope this isn't too much of a downer. —VeryRarelyStable 04:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]