User talk:NinHawk8940

This is NinHawk8940's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

What Not Do To Here (Outdated/Archived Rant Don't Listen)

Below is a rant I created back in February 2021, because a edit I created could have led me on a path to getting my account deleted, without realizing it. I got this message and created this rant the morning of after getting only 4 hours of sleep (4:20AM to 8:30AM) (even then that wasn't even core sleep, that was the time I spent in bed overall) after spending most of the night working on a project for a Web Development class at Uni. That was the least amount of sleep I ever got up to that point in my life; so you can imagine I wasn't happy nor to excited when I got critiqued during that day, I was more susceptible than usual. Anyways, just keeping this for archive as a notable petty moment during my time editing on Wikipedia. In general like the Wikipedia guidelines suggest, keep it PG/friendly as possible or civil when talking to me or anyone else on Wikipedia and here on this talk page. Here is it below (😳) NinHawk8940 (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC):[reply]

I do not mind people putting things here on the User Talk. Do not come here and disrespect or say anything perceived as threating (this also includes comments in edits and/or Revision history)). Come correct. Of course, this is subjective and can be seen as silly. However, please take a look.

Here is a great example (posted by Ss112 (yes I am calling you out lol)):

February 15, 2021 - The person who posted this believes I used vandalism and posted based on my "point of view" on the article, Calling My Phone (song) on Wikipedia. Even claiming, "You have been warned about this before. I sent you a warning in July 2019 about it. It does not mater how "likely" things are. YOU NEED SOURCES per WP:V. Stop doing this or you will be blocked." As if I put this on purpose to destroy the article. Also, the user didn't spell "mater" right, whatever. Do not assume I remember something from years ago or even a couple days ago. To be clear, I participate on Wikipedia when I can. This means I may not edit for months on end. This is also no excuse for vandalism. This means I just may forget certain rules from time to time, but I know what vandalism is. Please post the recommendation/suggestion/correction respectfully, do not threaten to "ban" me on something as simple as this. Saying "likely" is probably what ticked the user off, the boiling point, pushed to the edge. This user has also posted on the talk page, go ahead and compare to other posts from other users. Just say that I need to follow the article rules on music genres and say I need to make sure to remember that for next time. That is all you need to do.

For reference this is the article links to my edits (before they were removed): https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Calling_My_Phone&oldid=1006805499 https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Calling_My_Phone&oldid=1006805724

Was this vandalism? No! This was just simple mistake and can be easy corrected! Don't be a "------------------------------------------"

Here is the original version of the text posted on here and edited (simple and respectful text here): Original: "Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Calling My Phone, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 19:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)"

Edited: "Please source and discuss on talk page before adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Calling My Phone. Genre changes that aren't sourced or discussed can be considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 19:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)"

The original and edited are basically the same, but here are two examples of posts on here:

"I noticed that you made a change to an article, Panda (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)"

"Hey. Just wanted to make something clear for you. The "the" in "the Weeknd" is to be treated as normal English, per consensus made about a month ago. At the beginning of a sentence, capital is fine as that is proper English rules (example, "The Weeknd has collaborated with Ariana Grande multiple times"). But, if it’s in the middle of a sentence, you don’t capitalize, per English rules (example, "Ariana Grande has collaborated with the Weeknd multiple times"). Hope this helps! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 23:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! (already replied on the other's page) NinHawk8940 (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)"

Thanks for reading. Below are posts from before this post date and afterwards. NinHawk8940 (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, NinHawk8940, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Panda (song)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Panda (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5th Streamy Awards

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 5th Streamy Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones - Biggest single-week upward movements

I have had to revert your edits here because what you added makes the list in question have 11 entries, and we're restricting most lists in the article to the top 10. The list for "Biggest single-week upward movements" looks like this currently:

1) 97–1 (96 positions) – Kelly Clarkson — "My Life Would Suck Without You" (February 7, 2009)
2) 96–1 (95 positions) – Britney Spears — "Womanizer" (October 25, 2008)
3) 94–3 (91 positions) – Beyoncé and Shakira — "Beautiful Liar" (April 7, 2007)
4) 95–7 (88 positions) – Akon featuring Eminem — "Smack That" (October 14, 2006)
5) 97–9 (88 positions) – Drake featuring Nicki Minaj — "Make Me Proud" (November 5, 2011)
6) 96–11 (85 positions) – Carrie Underwood — "Cowboy Casanova" (October 10, 2009)
7) 100–15 (85 positions) – A. R. Rahman and Pussycat Dolls featuring Nicole Scherzinger — "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" (March 14, 2009)
8) 85–2 (83 positions) – Katy Perry — "Roar" (August 31, 2013)
9) 86–4 (82 positions) – Vanessa Hudgens and Zac Efron — "Breaking Free" (February 11, 2006)
10) 93–12 (81 positions) – Matchbox Twenty — "How Far We've Come" (September 22, 2007)

What you added is beyond this top 10. There is also a hidden note at the beginning of the section (when you bring up the section to edit) stating to keep the list to a top 10, unless there is a tie for 10th place. The size of the article is already too large and we need to limit the amount of prominence for any one category in that article. Please respect this limitation. Thanks. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T-Shirt (Migos song) (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheCatalyst31 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at T-Shirt (Migos song) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:T-Shirt (Migos song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NinHawk8940, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Starships (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Closer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Drake discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss 112 23:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Please add sources to your articles. Like on Damn (album) - it's easy to google 'canadian hot 100' and put the ref in. also don't use & [ampersand] in the main articles. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 21:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, ampersands suck. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard 200

Do not just update the date on the Billboard 200 without also updating the source. This does not suffice and looks like original research to editors. Ss 112 20:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:T-Shirt (Migos song)

Hello, NinHawk8940. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T-Shirt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 15:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NinHawk8940. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the 21 Savage discography page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Ss112 02:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Stylist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NinHawk8940. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pop Out (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear

Hey. Just wanted to make something clear for you. The "the" in "the Weeknd" is to be treated as normal English, per consensus made about a month ago. At the beginning of a sentence, capital is fine as that is proper English rules (example, "The Weeknd has collaborated with Ariana Grande multiple times"). But, if it’s in the middle of a sentence, you don’t capitalize, per English rules (example, "Ariana Grande has collaborated with the Weeknd multiple times"). Hope this helps! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 23:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! (already replied on the other's page) NinHawk8940 (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my editing mistake on SahBabii's Wikipedia page. Howtonotbesus Tik Tok (talk) 06:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! ❕ NinHawk8940 (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Track Star (song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Track Star (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DMX (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbling Under peaks: See WP:USCHARTS

Hello. Regarding this edit you made in July 2021, please see WP:USCHARTS. We do not add 100 places to Bubbling Under peaks and say this was the equivalent peak of the song. Songs fall out of the Hot 100 that do not reappear on the Bubbling Under Hot 100, making it very likely this was never actually number 101, as a song that fell out of the Hot 100 that week was probably number 101. As I'm sure you're aware, the Bubbling Under Hot 100 only ranks songs below the Hot 100 that have not (yet) appeared on the Hot 100 proper. Regardless of what Billboard has numbered it in the past, it's not correct to call it 101 because we do not actually know this. Thanks. Ss112 08:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I completely forgot about that edit. Thanks for reminding me about it, I believe I made that edit because I thought at the time that it was correct. It's clearly not, even though it did peak at number one on the Bubbling Under Hot 100. Thanks! ( Cordae just released his album which is cool, perfect timing) - NinHawk8940 (talk) 18:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]