User talk:Nileshbandhiya

Welcome!

Hello, Nileshbandhiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bhikhudan Gadhavi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Empty Buffer (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhikhudan Gadhavi

The article Bhikhudan Gadhavi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Empty Buffer (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rupayatan has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://rupayatan.wordpress.com.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of free gujarati tools

The article List of free gujarati tools has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a link repository.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Lear's Fool 08:33, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of free gujarati tools for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of free gujarati tools, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of free gujarati tools until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lear's Fool 08:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NetGPad

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on NetGPad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mrmatiko (talk) 11:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NetGPad

The article NetGPad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, no non-primary sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of NetGPad

Hello, I have nominated NetGPad, an article you have created, for deletion. I notice that the article was previously nominated for speedy deletion and proposed deletion, both of which you contested. While your article is not strictly an advertisement, the software it describes fails our notability guidelines, so we can not have an article about it on Wikipedia.

In order to have an article on Wikipedia, a subject needs to have received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources (explained at WP:42). This serves two purposes:

To prevent indiscriminate inclusion: If we have a short article for every piece of software ever coded by anyone, we would quickly become little more than a directory, not an encyclopedia.

To make sure information is neutral and verifiable: If there isn't enough coverage, information would have to come from either some source related to the software (e.g. its website) or your own knowledge. This means that the article is more likely to describe the software positively, and there would be no way for other people to check whether what you have written is true (because they can't trace it to an independent, reliable source).

For these reasons, I feel your article is not suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, and thus I'm nominating it for deletion. The discussion for the deletion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetGPad. Note that while I have explained my reasoning here, it is not a request for you to agree with me. Please read the notability guidelines and make your own judgement.

Don't be discouraged. Your contributions are appreciated, especially in areas where you ordinarily have no interest about. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reply here or on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing. wctaiwan (talk) 15:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nileshbandhiya. You have new messages at Wctaiwan's talk page.
Message added 05:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

wctaiwan (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with NetGPad. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gujarati computing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gujarati computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gujarati computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nileshbandhiya/Nilesh Bandhiya

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Nileshbandhiya/Nilesh Bandhiya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a userpage. Not a wikipedia article. And I have introduced myself only in the said page. But you can delete the page as per Wikipedia guidelines. I have no objection for the deleting page. Kindly do no add "SPAM USER" tag in my Username. I am not a spam user. Nilesh Bandhiya (talk) 03:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]