User talk:Nijamahmed

Welcome!

Hello, Nijamahmed, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Moju Chowdhuryhat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gronk Oz (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moju Chowdhuryhat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Moju Chowdhuryhat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Thousands Years

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Thousands Years, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://genius.com/Sting-a-thousand-years-lyrics.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A Thousands Years

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A Thousands Years requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://genius.com/Sting-a-thousand-years-lyrics. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moju Chowdhury Hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahidul Islam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moju Chowdhury Hat

Please stop restoring offensive material to the page Moju Chowdhury Hat. You have repeatedly inserted a photo of garbage, a taxi, and a toilet, claiming that it is a photo of a mosque, and you keep inserting the term nightmare, which must surely be offensive to people who live in Moju Chowdhury Hat. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Sminthopsis84. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Moju Chowdhury Hat because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Moju Chowdhury Hat. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your question

To answer your question from edit summaries at Moju Chowdhury Hat can I add other languages to the lead paragraph: no, that would not be appropriate. If there are pages in wikipedias in other languages, then they would be linked through wikidata, but I do not think such pages exist. In the English wikipedia it is only appropriate to have English and the local languages listed. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear smithopsis please go on Moju Chowdhury Hat article and grew it up as old version please just go on this page? ..thanks Nijamahmed (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Moju Chowdhury Hat, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But this article is needed pervious source please help it grew ... thanks Nijamahmed (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moju Chowdhury Hat

The article Moju Chowdhury Hat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible Hoax article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but this is not Wikipedia rule you can't deleted a Particular article. is too needed help but you wanted Speedy deletion it. because you don't know about this page. can you read full story and source please help it grew do not dump speedy Deletion?. Nijamahmed (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claiming to be an administrator

I have removed a userbox from your user page where you claimed to be an administrator. You are not an administrator, do not add the box back. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add the administrator userbox to your user page again, as you did here. You are not an administrator, so putting that userbox on your page was a lie. Do not lie in edit summaries, either. Saying that you were just fixing a typo was also a lie. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok will never add this administrator logo, you are happy. You are you a administrator on the English Wikipedia please help this article. Moju Chowdhury Hat this page is needed Revision. please see below? Nijamahmed (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

I also note that you have repeatedly made edits with edit summaries which completely misrepresent what you are doing, such as "fixed typo" for edits which do nothing of the sort. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And set them old version on this article. Nijamahmed (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]