Jump to content

User talk:Niharika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:NiharikaKohli)

Welcome!

Hello, NiharikaKohli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Test

[edit]

Hi NKohli_(WMF). @NKohli (WMF):

Thank you for taking part in the Community Health learning campaign!

[edit]
Hi in many languages

Hi NiharikaKohli,
I wanted to thank you for contributing a drawing to the collaborative mural at Wikimania 2015. In case you haven't seen it yet, we have posted a few [[questions on what makes a healthy community online. A lot of people have contributed their views there... feel free to share yours as well!
Happy editing, María (WMF) (talk) 21:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community Tech bot

[edit]

Please put the bot's data dumps into Wikipedia space instead of article space. I've deleted the last two runs, please let me know where you'd like them restored if you don't have the permissions. Acroterion (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely sorry for that. I'll fix that. NiharikaKohli (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it happens more often than you'd think. Acroterion (talk) 15:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Niharika,

I would like to run the forgotten articles query in the German Wikipedia, too. Could you do this?

Cheers, kopiersperre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kopiersperre (talkcontribs) 06:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes, I can do this. Where would you like me to dump the results? And would you want me to run it periodically via the bot? We don't have a bot flag on dewiki yet, so that might take some time. -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 09:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you could dump it here. Having a periodic bot run would be nice, but it's not necessary. Is it also possible to get a list of the smallest articles (in kb)?--Kopiersperre (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, now that we have an approval for running the bot on dewiki, can you tell me the dewiki URL corresponding to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Forgotten_articles on enwiki, so I can publish the report results there? Also, it'd be great if you could translate the report intro text and table headers for me. Just dump them here. -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, German Wikipedia does not have regular database reports. So you can place it where you want, e.g. here. I will inform the people about this new report.--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translations:

Diese Liste enthält die 1000 Artikel, die am längsten nicht mehr bearbeitet wurde. Als Bearbeitung zählt hierbei jede Aktion, die zu einer Aktualisierung des Seitencache führt, also neben Textbearbeitungen auch Seitensperrungen oder Änderungen an eingebundenen Vorlage.

Artikel – Letzte Bearbeitung – Bearbeitungen insgesamt

Thanks! -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has now finished running. Give it a look and tell me if it looks okay. There might be some bugs. -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the bot run, it has got some resonance. One person has argued, that the bot is missing articles, e.g. Eudos was edited last on 29 August 2013‎ and it's not on the list, which is going to 30 September 2013.--Kopiersperre (talk) 10:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
May you please tell me, how the bot works? Does it look for the page_touched field?--Kopiersperre (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Sorry for the delayed response, I was traveling for a couple of weeks. Yes, it looks for the page_touched field, which can produce some errors because the page_touched value can be changed by a lot of other factors than actual page editing, such as editing of an embedded template etc. However, in testing I found the percentage of such errors to be quite small, though admittedly I didn't test it exhaustively. The problem with using the exact last edit timestamp was that it increased the query time massively. Very large queries are, as of now, not supported on the labs infrastructure. Due to this reason, a number of reports on the english wikipedia have stopped working, or are intermittently working. Hence, reducing query processing time was one of our main concerns when writing the bot. Feel free to reach out if you have more concerns or have requests for making other reports available on dewiki. Thank you! -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And, wow! It certainly got a a lot of resonance. Can you tell me if the general sentiment is positive or negative? :) I'm not familiar with german, but it'd be nice to know what people think of this report and if there's interest in getting other similar reports. Thank you so much. -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
German Wikipedia is quite a shark pool. Some people have liked it, some argued, that time to last edit has nothing to do with quality and some argued, that the query is flawed. Merlissimo has made another database report as a consequence.
May you update the text to my changes?--Kopiersperre (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the updated text. I'll include it for the next bot run. Can you tell me how the new database report (created by Merlissimo) is correct? For the few pages I opened, the date in the report does not match the last edited timestamp of the page. Am I missing something here? -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 13:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The query from Merlissimo excludes Bot edits (source code is inside the <!-- --> block).--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see. That's a good idea. :) -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Niharika,

please change the text to Diese Liste enthält die 1000 Artikel, die am längsten nicht mehr bearbeitet wurde. Als Bearbeitung zählt hierbei jede Aktion, die zu einer Aktualisierung des Felds <code>page_touched</code> in der Datenbank führt, also neben Textbearbeitungen auch Seitensperrungen oder Änderungen an eingebundenen Vorlage. Für eine Liste der „wirklich“ am längsten nicht mehr von Menschen bearbeiten Artikel, siehe [[Benutzer:Merlissimo/LetzterEdit]]. --Kopiersperre (talk) 17:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Delhi Meetup

[edit]

Hi,

A meetup in New Delhi is scheduled for this Sunday, 30th April. This is backed with a photography exhibition of Wiki Loves Monument in India 2016. More details here here. Do join us. Abhinav619 (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Community Tech bot#Forgotten articles. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Global watchlist - Update 1

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 2

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 3

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 4

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 5

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 6

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 7

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 8

[edit]

Global watchlist - Update 9

[edit]