User talk:Nicstph

Welcome!

Hello, Nicstph, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicola, I'm trying to "introduce myself on another student's talk page"... we'll see if it works? Liz442442 (talk) 20:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, it worked! I'll try and introduce myself back :-) Nicstph (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffery Camp

If you want somewhere to work on this article until it's ready then I'd suggest creating it as a userspace draft and then moving it into the article namespace later. Hut 8.5 21:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for the advice! Nicstph (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gerard & Kelly) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gerard & Kelly, Nicstph!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 22:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Adamson (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please turn the external links you have placed in the article's body into references. See WP:REFB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Adamson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 10:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nicstph, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 10:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Glenn Adamson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glenn Adamson. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Adamson (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What actually substantiates notability here is either major reviews for his works or similar things to show he has been covered independently and significantly, and not in announcements or notices.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Adamson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Glenn Adamson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glenn Adamson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Glenn Adamson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glenn Adamson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]