User talk:Nicolewrayeditor

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Soccermeko (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolewrayeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just said I wasn't a sock. Why in this world did you jut block. You didn't block me because you thought I was a sock, You block me because you knew I would spread the truth about Nicole Wray. That's why you did it. I stated two mintes after I created my account that I was not a SOCKPUPPET. They said this on the board which is how i knew about it, and that's why I said what I said. I demand to be unblock. I have not even made any edits to the page yet. Besides you can't prove it, because I did nothing but stated what I said on my user page and Nicole Wray talk page. I also demand that you be block for abusing your powers as a adinstrator and be banned for editting for three weeks in doing so. I would like to demand that you be striped of your rank as Adminstrator. Because I am the victim of an innocent crime. I am not sockpuppet. I will not reveal my email Wikipedia now because there are a lot of people here who are mistrustful. You have me blocked for "Mistreatement of User account on a sockpuppet bases" I can't abuse it if I'm not the person.

Decline reason:

Your edits make it painfully obvious that you're a sock. — Grand master ka 00:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I was the blocking admin, I will not respond directly to this request. However, as a note to the admin that DOES respond to this request, please read the first edit in the contribs list, and reach your own conclusion. Methinks he doth protest too much... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me Think Nothing (Unblock)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolewrayeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My first edit means nothing. Just because somebody wants to change them lies on that page doesn't mean i'm a sock. And I protest because I can.

Decline reason:

Clearly editing on behalf of blocked users. — Yamla (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

4.129.71.200 (talk) 23:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]