User talk:Nicolas42155

This is Nicolas42155's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Laurena Giunipero, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nicolas42155/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Nicolas42155/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nicolas42155! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Laurena Giunipero has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laurena Giunipero. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicolas42155. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 09:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I couldn't find the solution to move my draft as an article on my account so I created a new one for being able to save as an article. My mistake. Can you please unblock my account and also help me to figure it out how to change my draft as an article. Thank you Nicolas42155 (talk) 03:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)}[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Laurena Giunipero

Draft:Laurena Giunipero, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Laurena Giunipero and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Laurena Giunipero during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolas42155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account have been blocked by my fault, I made some mistake with this account for creating a wikipedia page , and because I really needed to publish the page asap I created an other account to post it on a better way. I apology for this and I would like to be able to use this account again and publish for real this page. Thank you so muchNicolas42155 (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia doesn't have deadlines; why would you need to publish an article ASAP? Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:56, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolas42155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm actually doing an assessment for school about the Aerobics French team, about the development of this discipline and I wanted to refresh some informations about aerobics gymnastics and create Laurena's profil as she never had one.Nicolas42155 (talk) 02:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolas42155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you please review my demand just above, thank you Nicolas42155 (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time. Making "demands" isn't going to get you unblocked. Nick-D (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicolas42155 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I definitely understand my mistake, and I'll for sure not do this in the future. I'll be more careful when either I will edit a new profile or trying to add more informations through some pages. I will not cause any damages anymore as I know better how works wikipedia. I'm sorry for having some trouble while I just wanted to contribute on a positive way for wikipedia. Nicolas42155 (talk) 06:21, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Editing while logged out within 10 minutes of asking for an unblock doesn't give me hope that you understand why we limit people to one account. I have pulled your talk page access. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Nicolas42155/sandbox

Hello, Nicolas42155. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 17:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laurena Giunipero

Hello, Nicolas42155. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laurena Giunipero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]