User talk:Nicky1029384756

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Gballin0 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Nicky1029384756, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --barneca (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A minor problem[edit]

Hi Nicky1029384756, I really hate to pounce on one of your first edits, but something seems to have gone wrong, and I’ve reverted your recent edit on the page Shivang Patel.

Sorry for the length of this message, but since you haven’t been here before, it’s hard to tell if this was a test, a mistake, if you’re editing in pieces and weren’t done, or if this was vandalism. And there's always the very real possibility that I've made a mistake.

If it was a test edit, please experiment in the sandbox instead of in articles. You can do anything you like in the sandbox (within reason), without people like me sticking our noses in. Or, you can experiment in your own, personal sandbox here: User:Nicky1029384756/Sandbox.
If it was a mistake, don’t worry about it. Wiki’s make undoing mistakes easy. If you were about to revert your own mistake and I beat you to it, sorry for jumping the gun.
If you are doing things in stages, please use an edit summary explaining what you’re doing, and people who see your edit will give you time to finish up. In fact, it’s a good idea to always use an edit summary to explain your edit.
If it was vandalism, well, please don’t do that. It takes a lot of effort to revert vandalism, and it can get you blocked from editing articles.
Finally, if I've reverted a legitimate edit by mistake, then I apologize. Please feel free to put it back, but make sure to use an edit summary or leave an explanation on the article's talk page so I (and others) know to leave it alone this time.

If you’d like to discuss this, or anything else, please leave me a message at the bottom of my talk page. --barneca (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attack pages are not acceptable. Please do not recreate. --barneca (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit history[edit]

Nicky,

Please consider either:

(a) taking a look at some of the pages listed above about how to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, and helping out; or

(b) finding somewhere else to play.

I've removed most of the content of your user page; this isn't the place to insult other people. We welcome new editors trying to find their way around this site; if you have specific questions about how to edit Wikipedia, ask. But this isn't MySpace. Thanks. --barneca (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

Your user page still has insults to other people. I've removed it one last time. If you are not going to contribute to the encyclopedia, you will be blocked from editing. You have created inappropriate attack pages, MySpace-type user pages, made no attempt to discuss or change your behavior when I've pointed out several times that this is inappropriate, and you have not made any productive edits to the actual encyclopedia. Oh, and there's the pretty blatant use of sockpuppets on your deleted page, too. --barneca (talk) 14:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]