User talk:Nickpopoff

April 2011

Hello Nickpopoff. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peter Popoff, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. St Anselm (talk) 02:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been reported at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. --Daniel 06:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Compliance section at Peter Popoff

I have opened up a discussion explaining why the content you are adding is inappropriate. Please comment there rather than reverting. Consensus must be reached before new material is added. --Daniel 14:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Peter Popoff, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 01:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Popoff

The place to discuss your edits is Talk:Peter Popoff. Please be aware that adding words like "several news outlets" is considered WP:WEASEL words, and is extremely poor form. You have provided an article that calls him a cult leader, but largely as a hyperbolic reference to other people's description. The term cult is highly contentious, and needs strong sources and context. Wikipedia has specific policies regarding biographies of living people. Ole Anthony's status as a theoretical cult leader is not a suitable topic for inclusion in an article on Peter Popoff, and your phrasing looked like it was designed to undermine Anthony's criticism of Popoff. If you insist on added that sentence, please discuss at talk first, especially considering your obvious conflict of interest. Grayfell (talk) 05:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

then you will have no problem deleting the line that says

Some reporters are urging those who have donated money to Popoff in hopes of receiving "miracles" to report to the Attorney General in their state.[8]?

As I said, the place to discuss this is at Talk:Peter Popoff. You should discuss this there, so that other editors can see it. Grayfell (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Peter Popoff. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. As well please familiarize yourself with WP:3RR which you are well beyond and may be blocked from editing without further notice. Daffydavid (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. DKqwerty (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Launching Bibles to Cuba.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Launching Bibles to Cuba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Popoff Family.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Popoff Family.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]