User talk:Nickgray
|
|
One thing I just noticed, if anyone wants to help me undertake a MASSIVE project -- corporate Infoboxes for major tech companies have zero standardization. Looking at Google, Akamai, Apple, Cloudflare, etc. Some list co-founders, investors, products, technologies, stock prices, revenue, etc. IMHO this would benefit from standardization.
There you go, per request. See also the older versions (look in the history) of Lilting Banshees for potential material, which is a redirect page. If your article is accepted it will replace that page. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Nickgray! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Nickgray! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Nickgray! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Question about a potential COI
[edit]Given this post: [1], I'm wondering if you have a WP:COI in re: Cloudflare. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- K.e.coffman Nope, no COI, but good question considering my very pro-Cloudflare stance! To be clear on no COI: I don’t work there, have never applied to work there, never plan to work there, have never been paid by the company, am not Facebook friends with anyone who works at the company (to my knowledge), never made a VC or angel investment, etc. My editing interest is around improving the article: I’m honestly shocked how much negativity their Wikipedia page is focused on, as compared to the bulk of the company and the tech improvements they’re making to the internet and helping Wikipedia and Wikipedia. Any suggestions are appreciated to more accurately reflect a cool company with thousands of employees. Adding their product info seems to be the best route to add non-scandal stuff to beef out the article.
- Similarly interesting to me, I’ve noticed that public SaaS company websites have almost zero standardization regarding which headers are displayed and included — as you noticed, Fastly had Acquisitions, as does Akamai, and some others. It would be an interesting standardization project, as I learn more about Wikipedia, if you’re ever interested to collaborate, to propose some sort of header schema for American public software companies. Any interest, or suggestions how I would further that idea? Nickgray (talk) 01:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced information
[edit]Please don't add unsourced information as Wikipedia cannot host original research. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, Justin (koavf). I've found the source easily online so I'll go back and revert your edits, then add sources. Nickgray (talk) 10:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nickgray, Thank you Nick. Take a look at this method to save you a little typing for references that you repeat. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Nickgray! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lilting Banshees (October 10)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lilting Banshees and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Lilting Banshees, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Nickgray!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Nickgray! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
For consistent updates on the page "Cloudflare" while working under a semi-hostile environment. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 21:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC) |
Seasons Greetings
[edit]Yo Ho Ho
[edit]Andrew nyrtalkcontribs is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.
Cloudflare RfC Review
[edit]Hello, Nickgray - I saw your edits on the Cloudflare page, and was wondering if you would be willing to review the RfC discussion I began on the Talk page in December? I have reached consensus for a review and some condensing with a handful of editors, but none of my requests or proposals have been reviewed, discussed, or resolved.
(I note this everywhere, so I will note my COI here as well - I am an employee of Cloudflare, editing the page is not among my primary duties, and I am obviously not editing the page directly, or trying to push any promotional content). Thank you! Ryanknight24 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I will take a look when I have some time. The last I saw, there was consensus to condense but no clear path forward. It was a bit confusing for me to make heads or tails of it. Nickgray (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)