User talk:Nickelaus

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the September 11 attacks, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ian.thomson (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's stance is to go with the reality-based "account," not with conspiracy theories. End of discussion. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying Wikipedia should simply conform to whatever government reports say? Is that the standard? How do you think this policy works out for China? Would you say that all content of a Chinese Wikipedia was true? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Censorship_of_Wikipedia#China Nickelaus (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that Wikipedia's arbitration committee has gotten tired of people who deny reality. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]