User talk:Nickafro-latino

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I Just did a summary about the B. Jararacussu.☺ Nickafro-latino (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Loxosceles intermedia

Hi, I edited the article Loxosceles intermedia which you created. I assume you speak Portuguese. Please check that I have written the Portuguese correctly in the reference by Cristina Lúcia Sant'Ana Costa Ayub. I think her father's surname is Costa, husband's surname Ayub, so her surname is written "Costa Ayub", but I may be wrong. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent problems with your edits

Hi. Nearly all of your recent edits are problematic in one of several ways, and you seem to be ignoring other editor's comments entirely, often making the same changes repeatedly. Many of your edits involve adding content without supporting sources (e.g., inserting "renal failure" as a result of myoglobin in the blood, with no citation to support this side-effect); many edits mis-quote or mis-cite the sources used (e.g., listing species names, or statistics, that were not mentioned at all in the paper cited); many edits plagiarize the sources you do cite (a direct violation of explicit Wikipedia policy); some of the sources you cite do not comply with Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources (especially important for medically important information); you often duplicate the same citation every time instead of using "ref name" conventions; you replace objective statements with subjective statements (e.g., replacing "medically significant" with "highly venomous"). As such, many of the actions you take are not proper editorial practices, and it is important that you learn and follow better practices in keeping with Wikipedia policy, or you risk losing editing privileges. Dyanega (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

If you are the same user as User:Afrolatin, please note that you may be breaking policy at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. You can declare socks, but if they are being used to avoid being detected, you can be blocked. Shyamal (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Just created another account Because I had lost the password for my other account, but I have already recovered it. Nickafro-latino (talk) 02:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you also lost the passwords to the accounts User:Southamericannick and User:Nick Falcão?? Four accounts for a single user seems like too many to just be lost passwords. Dyanega (talk) 15:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't lose them, they are accounts of when I was still learning to use wikipedia, I lost the password for the Nickafro-Latin account (which has already been recovered) which is my official account at the moment.

Uma vez mais...

O problema não é sua habilidade de escrever em inglês; o problema é que você está violando muitas das regras explícitas que os editores devem seguir. Se você não tem certeza de quais são essas regras, talvez ache útil aprender as regras em português; os princípios são exatamente os mesmos em ambas as línguas.

Em particular, fontes confiáveis: [1]

Por exemplo, o artigo de Kamimura quase não contém informações genuínas sobre L. gaucho. A identidade da aranha não foi confirmada por um aracnologista, foi apenas um palpite, baseado no que a velha disse aos médicos, e pode ter sido qualquer uma das várias espécies de aranhas. Ela tinha dor, uma ferida necrótica, e constipação. Nada mais. Este artigo não é científico, é uma bosta. Os comentários neste artigo sobre o veneno se referem ao veneno de Loxosceles EM GERAL, e não especificamente ao veneno de L. gaucho; você não pode usar este comentário geral, sobre o gênero, para adicionar conteúdo sobre essa espécie ESPECÍFICAMENTE.

Em uma maneira semelhante, o artigo de Silveira contém informações sobre laeta e faz somente suposições sobre o gaucho, sem fornecer dados reais referentes especificamente a gaucho.

Em outro nível, você edita artigos repetidamente para adicionar termos subjetivos, como alterar "venomous" para "highly venomous". Não existe uma escala objetiva, nenhuma padronização oficial, para distinguir "venomous" como uma categoria diferente de "highly venomous" - NÃO é apropriado editar artigos dessa forma, pois não há nenhuma fonte confiável sendo consultada que forneça uma definição objetiva destes termos ou categorias.

Você precisa aprender as regras e segui-las; se você continuar a violar as regras, suas edições não serão aceitas e você poderá ter seus privilégios de edição revogados. Dyanega (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

right.

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Loxosceles_gaucho, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that you are edit warring - see Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule - you need to discuss the contention in a civil way otherwise you (and your socks) will be blocked. Shyamal (talk) 04:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chilean recluse spider, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Catarina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Micrurus frontalis

added links pointing to Terrestrial and Ptosis

Micrurus lemniscatus

added a link pointing to Terrestrial

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scorpaena plumieri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agitation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zimmerman's poison frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bothrops jararacussu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philodryas olfersii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swelling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tityus obscurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santarém.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sicarius thomisoides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bothrops venezuelensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swelling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phoneutria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agitation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bothrops erythromelas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FII.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your edit to Bothrops erythromelas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation at Bothrops erythromelas (again)

Your edit to Bothrops erythromelas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 14:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After further review of your contributions, there are too many instances of copyright violations, with no acknowledgment of the warnings on this talk page, for you to continue editing without demonstrating an understanding of the issues and resolving to avoid copying text from other websites in the future. Please familiarize yourself with the copyright policy and then, if you wish, formulate an unblock request that addresses the issues with your edits and demonstrates a commitment to not copy from other websites in the future. Thanks, DanCherek (talk) 14:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm still learning English, well I didn't read that, the first time I edited and added content about the venom I thought it had been removed because my text was too big, implying that I had copied and pasted , but I hadn't done that, I wrote everything on my cell phone, so this second time I edited I wrote a smaller text because I thought the previous text had been removed because it was too big, that's why I edited it again, I unfortunately I don't understand much about this copyright issue, I wasn't adding anything here anymore because my computer broke and it's very tiring to edit on my cell phone, that's why I put smaller texts, I hope you can understand what I wrote here because I translated everything using google translator. Nickafro-latino (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your additions to articles have been copied from other websites, scientific journals, etc. That's not okay when the source material is not in the public domain nor compatibly licensed. That includes your most recent edits to Bothrops erythromelas, which were copied from this source. If I'm understanding you correctly, you're re-typing the text on your phone, but that doesn't make it okay if you are using the same words as the source. DanCherek (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I write a summary in my notebook and then write it on my phone, the first time I started editing I copied and pasted a text about Jararacussu bites from pubmed but then it was removed so I added it a second time and it was removed again , the third time I added it, I didn't copy and paste but I wrote it, and after I wrote it I saw that my text hadn't been removed, so after that I stopped copying and pasting and started writing and summarizing. Nickafro-latino (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]