Jump to content

User talk:NickLagos1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citywideshopper (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OlifanofmrTennant were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 22:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, NickLagos1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 22:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citywideshopper (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OlifanofmrTennant were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 23:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Citywideshopper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
  1. significant coverage in
  2. independent,
  3. multiple,
  4. reliable,
  5. secondary sources.
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you i will follow the criteria's NickLagos1 (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

[edit]

Hi, a bit of unsolicited advice on trying to create Draft:Citywideshopper... Don't write what you know, or what you or your boss or your marketing team wants to say, about the business, and then try to find sources that somehow 'sort of' support what you've written. That's going about it WP:BACKWARD. Instead, find three solid secondary sources (newspapers, magazines, TV/radio programmes, etc.) that are fully independent of the subject, reliable, and provide significant coverage directly of the subject (not of some related topics), and summarise (in your own words, but without putting any 'spin' on things) what they have said, nothing more, nothing less. Cite each of the sources against the information it has provided. That way you'll have both your content and your referencing, and with a bit of luck end up with a draft that is neutral and unbiased and demonstrates that the subject is notable per WP:GNG. Any other approach is likely to go wrong somewhere. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Citywideshopper has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Citywideshopper. Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Citywideshopper

[edit]

Information icon Hello, NickLagos1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Citywideshopper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Citywideshopper

[edit]

Hello, NickLagos1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Citywideshopper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]