User talk:Nichellebelle80

Welcome!

Hello, Nichellebelle80, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Saving joy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuhwuzdat (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saving joy

A tag has been placed on Saving joy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that your account name is similar to this organization's founder. It is possible that a conflict of interest exists. If so, please be very careful to write the article on Saving Joy from a proper neutral point of view. Also please review the links in the welcome message above. Happy editing! --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with Saving joy

Page Saving joy is up for deletion. Lots of volunteers and questions about the charity. Help me with the page.

(Editor's help request copied here from article talk page, added article link. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nichellebelle80 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Saving joy

I have nominated Saving joy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saving joy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD tags

Do not remove AFD tags while the article is being discussed. if you want to discuss it, that is the proper place. A new name 2008 (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Saving joy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MuZemike 00:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Saving joy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Irunongames • play 00:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I am confused. How is editing an article I wrote vandalism? Do you see a need to include the board's names? One of the comments on the deletion page suggested this was a vanity page. Since I cannot delete the page I was simply trying to make it less personal so that it won't seem like a "vanity" page. Just a little confused on your logic? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nichellebelle80 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 18 June 2009

Removing content without explanation is unconstructive. A new name 2008 (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irunongames I responded to your previous comment and you did not answer me. I asked how editing the article was vandalism? I added my comments for the edit and gave reasons. Your edits and comments seem in bad faith

I was about to answet that. I was not on your user page at the time. Please contact me on my userpage next time. I undid my last warning because you gave a edit summery but kept the table. Discuss on the talk page of the article before blanking anything. Thanks! :D Irunongames • play 00:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]