Jump to content

User talk:Nicharis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Nicharis! I noticed your contributions to Assunta Spina (1915 film) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome! I have made a few edits here and there in the past few weeks, but didn't decide to actually make a profile until yesterday. I appreciate this message so much, and will poke around in the spaces you linked me to :-) Nicharis (talk) 04:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Social Secretary (August 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello - I am not sure what precisely you felt should be added in terms of references for this silent film. I have read many articles of films from this era that have often have only one or two references. Assunta Spina, The Tenth Symphony, and The Queen of Spades are all examples of similar articles that have fewer references than my draft for The Social Secretary. Is there something in particular you felt was lacking from mine? Nicharis (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You need independent secondary sources. What other (bad) articles have is not relevant. You have two primary references (catalog entries, basically) and one secondary source (but without a page number: it's on page 422). As far as I'm concerned the movie is likely to be notable given the producer and the director, but you need to prove that. So look through books--don't settle for catalogs. You only need a few more. Drmies (talk) 21:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, one more thing. The plot is really, really long--see MOS:PLOT. If you look through Google Books, you find this and this and this. Drmies (talk) 21:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]